MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415136222 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.11.681731

High-throughput multispecies qPCR assays to study the effects of acute thermal stress in three species of <i>Acipenser</i> sturgeon

2025· preprint· en· W4415136222 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hossein Haghighi, William S. Bugg, Faith M. Penny, Scott A. Pavey, Nicholas J. Bernier, Kenneth M. Jeffries

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of ManitobaGenome Canada
KeywordsAcclimatizationTranscriptomeSturgeonGene expressionGeneReal-time polymerase chain reactionCold stressMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, we developed a multispecies OpenArray™ qPCR “chip” to measure the effects of acute thermal stress on the mRNA response of Acipenser sturgeons. The qPCR chips were then tested on three species: Acipenser fulvescens , Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus , and Acipenser brevirostrum. The A. fulvescens were from two genetically distinct populations (Burntwood River and Winnipeg River, Manitoba, Canada) that were acclimated to three different temperatures (16, 20, and 24 °C) to quantify the effects of genetic background and acclimation temperatures on the transcriptomic response to acute thermal stress. Additionally, juvenile A. oxyrinchus oxyrinchus and A. brevirostrum were acclimated to 10 °C and then experienced acute thermal stress. All three species were sampled for gill and liver before and after experiencing acute thermal stress, which was applied using a CT max test. The expression of 52 genes of interest was quantified using the multispecies qPCR chip for all three species, along with 4 reference genes. We showed that acute thermal stress affected the mRNA expression of 17-26 of the thermal metabolic stress genes that were assayed using the chip, depending on the species. However, the mRNA patterns varied between species and genetically distinct populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→French-language works237,207→