OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Masseter Muscle Prominence: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results, Including Patient-Reported Outcomes, From a Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multiregional Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Masseter muscle prominence (MMP) may be aesthetically bothersome to some individuals, leading them to seek treatment for a slimmer lower face. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of MMP, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter trial including a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period (Days 1-180) in which adults rated Grade 4 or 5 (marked/very marked) on the investigator-assessed MMP Scale (MMPS) were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA 72 U or placebo. Efficacy endpoints were assessed at Day 90. The primary endpoint was ≥2-grade improvement from baseline on the investigator-assessed MMPS. Secondary endpoints included achieving Grade ≤3 on the MMPS and participant-assessed MMPS-Participant (MMPS-P), ≥2-grade improvement on the participant-assessed MMPS-P, and change from baseline in lower-facial width. Outcomes were assessed using validated measures. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Of 376 enrolled participants (onabotulinumtoxinA, n = 283; placebo, n = 93), 310 (82.4%) completed the study. At Day 90, a greater proportion of onabotulinumtoxinA-treated participants vs placebo achieved MMPS ≥2-grade improvement (51.2% vs 2.2%, P < .0001), and more onabotulinumtoxinA-treated participants vs placebo achieved the secondary endpoints (all P < .0001), with a mean lower-facial width reduction of -5.24 mm for onabotulinumtoxinA vs -0.04 mm for placebo (P < .0001). Participants reported benefits for onabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo in self-perceived change in MMP, treatment satisfaction, and psychosocial impact. Improvements were sustained through Day 180. Most AEs were mild, nonserious, and resolved. CONCLUSIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA effectively reduced the appearance of MMP and improved PROs, with effects lasting up to 6 months and a favorable safety profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".