MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415361197 · doi:10.3390/cells14201628

Non-Competitive AMPA Receptor Antagonist Perampanel Inhibits Ischemia-Induced Neurodegeneration and Behavioral Deficits in Focal Cortical Pial Vessel Disruption Stroke Model

2025· article· en· W4415361197 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael G. Zaki, Mohamed Taha Moutaoufik, Mahboubeh Pordeli, Mohan Babu, Changiz Taghibiglou, Francisco S. Cayabyab

Bibliographic record

VenueCells · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsPerampanelNeuroprotectionAMPA receptorNeurodegenerationNMDA receptorGlutamate receptorBrain ischemiaStroke (engine)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glutamate receptors represent a potential target for neuroprotection in neurodegenerative neurological conditions. Perampanel, a non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate receptor (AMPAR) antagonist, is clinically approved for the management of epilepsy. Perampanel's neuroprotective effects have been reported in global and focal cerebral ischemia models, but the cellular mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Therefore, we studied the potential neuroprotective effects of perampanel in rats using the pial vessel disruption (PVD) stroke model, an established focal cortical non-reperfusion ischemic stroke model. Perampanel was given once intraperitoneally (3 mg/kg body weight) 1 h after PVD surgery and repeated on days 2-3 post-surgery. On the fourth day post PVD, animal behavioral assays and imaging, biochemical, and electrophysiological analyses were performed. Compared to vehicle control, perampanel in PVD-treated rats significantly inhibited hippocampal neurodegeneration and long-term potentiation deficits. Perampanel also attenuated PVD-induced motor deficits, depressive/anxiety-like behaviors, and hippocampal-dependent cognitive impairment. In addition, perampanel prevented the PVD-induced downregulation of surface-expressed GluA1 and GluA2 AMPARs and increased phosphorylation of GluA1 at S831 and S845. Molecular docking analysis revealed perampanel binding to transmembrane regions M1, M3 and M4 of GluA1 and GluA2 subunits. Together, our results show that perampanel attenuated PVD-induced neurodegeneration and behavioral deficits by blocking AMPARs and decreasing GluA1 and GluA2 internalization. In addition, this study shows the neuroprotective potential of perampanel through the inhibition of neuroinflammation mediated by activated microglia and astrocytes following cerebral ischemia. This study is the first to evaluate perampanel in the pial vessel disruption model of ischemia without reperfusion, a clinically relevant stroke paradigm that differs fundamentally from middle cerebral carotid artery occlusion and photothrombosis stroke models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellsSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207