MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415396832 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.19.25338308

Oxidative Stress, Neuroinflammation, and Neuronal Vulnerability Begin in Midlife: a 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Healthy Adult Lifespan Study

2025· preprint· W4415396832 on OpenAlexafffund
Flavie E. Detcheverry, Sneha Senthil, Samson Antel, Haz-Edine Assemlal, Zahra Karimaghaloo, Douglas L. Arnold, Jamie Near, Sridar Narayanan, AmanPreet Badhwar

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversité de MontréalSunnybrook Health Science CentreInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRéseau en Bio-Imagerie du Quebec
KeywordsOxidative stressWhite matterAging brainBrain agingMagnetic resonance imagingHealthy agingAgeingGlutathionePosterior cingulate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION While changes associated with age-related diseases, like oxidative stress, begin in midlife, most aging studies focused on older individuals. Our study assessed in vivo brain metabolites in healthy adults, including the understudied middle-age group. METHODS 7 tesla magnetic resonance spectroscopy data were acquired from 95 healthy adults (48 women) aged 20-79 years. Eight metabolites were measured in posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and centrum semiovale white matter (CSWM). RESULTS With increasing age, we found (a) lower glutathione and glutamate, and higher myo- inositol in PCC, and (b) lower N -acetylaspartate and glutamate, and higher myo -inositol, total creatine, and N -acetylaspartyl-glutamate in CSWM. Notably, most changes started in midlife and were driven by age-related changes in women. DISCUSSION Overall, we found evidence that oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neuronal vulnerability begin in midlife in healthy adults. Targeting these processes in midlife may slow brain aging and reduce age-related neurodegenerative diseases risk, including Alzheimer’s disease. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207