MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415609021 · doi:10.1093/brain/awaf410

IgA autoantibodies demonstrate a novel mechanism of MuSK myasthenia gravis pathology

2025· article· en· W4415609021 on OpenAlexaff
Gianvito Masi, Kangzhi Chen, Alexandra Clarissa Bayer, Rafael Bayarri‐Olmos, Minh Pham, Annabel Wallace, Silvia Falso, Amelia Evoli, Raffaele Iorio, Kenneth B. Hoehn, Akiko Iwasaki, Richard J. Nowak, Kevin C. O’Connor

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesRare Diseases Clinical Research NetworkMuscular Dystrophy AssociationNational Institutes of HealthMyasthenia Gravis Foundation of America
KeywordsAutoantibodyIsotypeMyasthenia gravisAntibodyPolyclonal antibodiesAcetylcholine receptorAutoimmunityEpitope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis (MG) develop muscle weakness due to functionally monovalent immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 autoantibodies (Abs) that target MuSK and disrupt acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clustering. Emerging evidence from other autoimmune conditions suggests that Abs of the IgA class-the archetypal immunoglobulin isotype at mucosal sites-may synergize with IgG Abs, contributing to pathology. In MuSK MG, however, the presence of disease-specific IgA Abs has not yet been recognized, limiting a broader understanding of IgG4-driven autoimmunity. To address this knowledge gap, we leveraged cell-based binding assays, patient-derived recombinant monoclonal autoantibodies (mAbs), high-throughput B-cell receptor sequencing, C2C12 mouse myotube cultures and passive immunization experiments. Among 112 sera collected from 25 patients with MuSK MG (discovery cohort), MuSK-specific IgA Abs were detected in eight samples, corresponding to 3/25 (12%) patients. This finding was validated in a second, independent cohort (validation cohort; n = 14 individuals), wherein one additional patient (1/14; 7.1%) harboured MuSK IgA Abs. Across all cases, MuSK IgA Abs coexisted with MuSK IgG Abs, while domain mapping demonstrated a polyclonal IgA response in 2/4 (50%) patients. Notably, in a paradigmatic case with longitudinal samples spanning over a decade, MuSK IgA seropositivity was persistent, and clonally expanded MuSK IgA B cells showed remarkable resistance to therapeutic B-cell depletion. We generated three patient-derived MuSK-specific IgA mAbs for in-depth molecular profiling. These mAbs were highly hypermutated, bound to distinct MuSK domains and shared target epitopes with MuSK IgG4 mAbs. Two IgA mAbs cross-reacted with murine MuSK, enabling functional studies with C2C12 myotubes. Mechanistically, individual IgA mAbs promoted AChR clustering (indicative of MuSK agonism) and partially antagonized the pathogenic effects of MuSK IgG4 monovalency. When modelling a polyclonal response, however, the combination of the same IgA mAbs significantly impaired cluster formation, demonstrating cooperative pathogenic potential. Consistent with this, passive transfer of both IgA clones into mice induced a myasthenic phenotype characterized by progressive weight loss, muscle weakness and structural disruption of the neuromuscular junction (effects similar to those elicited by a functionally monovalent MuSK IgG4 mAb). These findings uncover a previously unrecognized pathogenic Ab isotype in a subset of patients with MuSK MG and show a mechanism through which bivalent MuSK Abs may synergize to induce pathology. The identification of MuSK-specific IgA B cells could signal a role of mucosal or environmental factors in the pathogenesis of MuSK MG and other IgG4-mediated diseases, offering a worthy avenue for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaFrench-language works237,207