MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415712335 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116498

In vivo differentiation of embryonic cells devoid of key reprogramming factors

2025· article· en· W4415712335 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Scott E. Youlten, Liyun Miao, Caroline Hoppe, Curtis W. Boswell, Damir Musaev, Mario Abdelmessih, Damilola Olowookere, Linnea A. Weiss, Smita Krishnaswamy, Antonio J. Giráldez, Valerie A. Tornini

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentSurdna FoundationHuman Frontier Science ProgramNational Institutes of HealthEuropean Molecular Biology Organization
KeywordsReprogrammingTotipotentEmbryonic stem cellCellular differentiationCell fate determinationSomatic cellTranscription factorOocyteDevelopmental biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embryonic cell differentiation depends on reprogramming of the oocyte and sperm nucleus into a transient totipotent state. In zebrafish, this coincides with genome activation, which is regulated by the pioneer factors Nanog, Pou5f3, and Sox19b (NPS). Here, we investigate the role of NPS in developmental reprogramming and differentiation by analyzing the fate of NPS mutant cells in a wild-type embryo using single-cell RNA-seq. We find that many cells fail to activate transcription or undergo cell death, while others acquire gene expression profiles that resemble germ cells, neural progenitors, and motoneuron states. These cells achieve intermediate transcriptional states, revealing the essential role of NPS in coordinating nuclear and cytoplasmic reprogramming and preventing the premature activation of lineage-specific differentiation programs. These results demonstrate that most developmental programs require developmental reprogramming by NPS, yet some cells can bypass transient totipotency to achieve intermediate developmental states resembling wild-type states in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationFrench-language works237,207