In vivo differentiation of embryonic cells devoid of key reprogramming factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Embryonic cell differentiation depends on reprogramming of the oocyte and sperm nucleus into a transient totipotent state. In zebrafish, this coincides with genome activation, which is regulated by the pioneer factors Nanog, Pou5f3, and Sox19b (NPS). Here, we investigate the role of NPS in developmental reprogramming and differentiation by analyzing the fate of NPS mutant cells in a wild-type embryo using single-cell RNA-seq. We find that many cells fail to activate transcription or undergo cell death, while others acquire gene expression profiles that resemble germ cells, neural progenitors, and motoneuron states. These cells achieve intermediate transcriptional states, revealing the essential role of NPS in coordinating nuclear and cytoplasmic reprogramming and preventing the premature activation of lineage-specific differentiation programs. These results demonstrate that most developmental programs require developmental reprogramming by NPS, yet some cells can bypass transient totipotency to achieve intermediate developmental states resembling wild-type states in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".