MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415712665 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.10.125

Interpolating Control for Precision Positioning affected by pre-sliding Friction

2025· article· en· W4415712665 on OpenAlexaff
Per Olof Gutman, Hoai‐Nam Nguyen, Ari Berger, Arkady Lichtsinder

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsWorld Wildlife Fund Canada
FundersTechnion-Israel Institute of Technology
KeywordsPosition (finance)Control theory (sociology)RegulatorConvergence (economics)VibrationResidualWaferPosition sensor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For wafer inspection, an X-Y stage is used to position the wafer under a probe, such as X-ray or similar, with an accuracy of tens of nano-meters or less. The point-to-point movement typically consists of three phases: “move” when the position is controlled to follow a so-called S-curve, “settle” when the position is made to enter the convergence window, and “idle” when residual vibrations are damped and the position reaches the set-point with required accuracy. The “move” and “settle” plants are characterized by double-integrator dynamics with viscous and Coulomb friction, and the “idle” plant by pre-sliding friction dynamics that can be modeled as one or more mass-spring-damper systems. Taking into account high-frequency parasitic resonances and anti-resonances, non-linearities, and uncertainties, it is in general difficult, or impossible, to design one linear regulator for all three phases. Hence, one regulator is generally applied for “move” and “settle”, and another one for the ”idle” phase. The problem of switching between the regulators, preferably in a bump-less way in order not to evoke the parasitic resonances, has been treated in an ad-hoc manner in the literature and in industrial practice. Here, we suggest bump-less transfer between the regulators based on interpolating control, using a recent, simple friction model that includes pre-sliding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207