MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

614 Treatment with diacylglycerol kinase (DGK) alpha specific inhibitor BAY2862789 exhibits combination potential with DGK zeta inhibition in biomarker assays during FIH monotherapy trial

2025· article· W4415900237 on OpenAlexaff
Helge G. Roider, Lidia Sacchetto, Dennis Kirchhoff, Nicole Schubert, Stefanie Reif, Bart A. Ploeger, Anke Weispfenning, Janine Noth, Teresa F. Lunt, Jasminka Cormarkovic-dragovic, Laura Hunt, Jamina Eckhard-Dietrich, Andrea Frohwann, Sook Hee Hong, Guru Sonpavde, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Enriqueta Felip, Aaron R. Hansen, Javier García-Corbacho, Jeong Eun Kim, Ofra Maimon, Shirish M. Gadgeel, Tae Min Kim, Ravit Geva, Christoph Mancao, Leila Khoja, David Schaer

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiacylglycerol kinaseBiomarkerAlpha (finance)KinaseIn vivo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background While checkpoint immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, responses are observed only in a subset of patients. The finite capacity of a patient’s immune system to recognize tumor mutations as foreign antigens is a major factor limiting the benefit of approved immunotherapies. Diacylglycerol kinases alpha (DGKα) and zeta (DGKζ) are expressed in T cells and play key non-redundant roles modulating the intensity of T cell receptor (TCR) signalling. Through phosphorylation of the critical secondary messenger diacylglycerol (DAG) to form phosphatidic acid, DGKs act as intracellular checkpoints attenuating T cell activation, limiting recognition of tumor antigens. DGKα cooperates with DGKζ to regulate the levels of DAG, suggesting that dual DGKα/ζ inhibition would result in the maximal biologic effect. Preclinically, inhibition of DGKα with BAY2862789 increases T cell activation and resistance to immune suppression that is further elevated in conjunction with inhibition of DGKζ by BAY2965501, to levels above either monotherapy. This suggests that BAY2862789 has the potential to strengthen patient anti-tumor responses which could be further enhanced in combination with BAY2965501.Methods Monotherapy BAY2862789 treatment is currently under investigation in a FIH dose escalation study ( NCT05858164) evaluating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. To assess the capacity of BAY2862789 to modulate a patient’s immune responses, changes in T cell activation were tracked in peripheral blood by flow cytometry and with ex vivo assays to measure TCR downstream ERK phosphorylation and cytokine production during treatment (n≥30). A Limited number of paired biopsies were also evaluated. Additionally, to understand if BAY2862789 exposure in patients was sufficient to observe effects of DGKα/ζ dual inhibition, DGKζ inhibitor BAY2965501 was spiked into ex vivo assays to compare changes on treatment to baseline.Results BAY2862789 was able to achieve blood exposure above preclinically defined EC80, however, no consistent increase >2-fold from baseline was observed in ERK phosphorylation or cytokine production. Despite this, a low frequency of patients did display T cell activation in situ (>2-fold increases in Ki67+), suggesting potential pharmacologic activity. Accordingly, ex vivo assays performed on a subset of patients (n=>10), including the addition of BAY2965501, demonstrated synergistic elevation in IFNγ and IL2 production on-treatment compared to baseline.Conclusions Specific inhibition of DGKα by BAY2862789 alone does not lead to substantial immune modulation in patients, despite reaching sufficient exposure to synergize with BAY2965501 in ex vivo assays. Data suggests that BAY2862789 should be combined with DGKζ inhibition to achieve the greatest T cell activation in patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207