MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

658 KAN-001, a defined live biotherapeutic product (LBP) for NSCLC, enhances ICI response in preclinical models and demonstrates manufacturing consistency and strain-resolved viability

2025· article· W4415900261 on OpenAlexaff
Aditya Bhalla, Peter J Diebold, Pallavi Murugkar, Jackson Mintz, Hannah Bronson, Anjali Doshi, James E. Berleman, Philip Burnham, Lee R. Swem, Hao Shi, Prateek Sehgal, Gregory T. Booth, Srikar Vedala, K. Robertson, Meriem Messaoudene, Marguerite Prior, Mark Weinberg, Bertrand Routy, Arielle Elkrief, Matthew P. Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
KeywordsConsistency (knowledge bases)Product (mathematics)New product developmentSelection (genetic algorithm)Manufacturing process

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The gut microbiome modulates host immunity and responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from ICI-responsive donors can improve outcomes in ICI-refractory patients, but FMT-based approaches suffer from donor availability, compositional variability, safety issues, and limited scalability. KAN-001 is a fully defined, Live Biotherapeutic Product (LBP) comprised of dozens of strains and designed to recapitulate the beneficial properties of responder FMT while offering a consistent and scalable manufacturing process supported by strain-level assays. Importantly, the strains comprising the product were isolated from a cancer patient who obtained a complete response to PD-1 therapy, and whose FMT was able to elicit response in cancer patients with tumors initially refractory to ICI. We report preclinical efficacy, strain engraftment data, and process development highlights supporting the planned clinical evaluation of KAN-001.Methods KAN-001 candidates were evaluated in the MCA205 murine tumor model in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy. Comparative arms included treatment with FMT from ICI-non-responder donors. Engraftment of KAN-001 strains was assessed in vivo by metagenomic sequencing and HiPR-FISH, a high-plex imaging approach that enables spatial mapping of strain colonization in host tissue. The use of the HiPR-FISH platform also enabled the optimization of KAN-001 candidates, including strain additions through HiPR-ID-based targeted isolation. Run-to-run manufacturing consistency was assessed using small-scale production runs analyzed by metagenomics and HiPR-Vie, a HiPR-FISH-based platform allowing strain-level viability profiling of complex microbial communities.Results KAN-001 combined with ICI treatment resulted in tumor volume regression superior to FMT from ICI-non-responder donors, with optimized candidates leveraging HiPR-FISH showing improved tumor control in the murine model. Metagenomic profiling confirmed reproducible in vivo engraftment of KAN-001 strains, with HiPR-FISH revealing spatially distinct colonization patterns across the GI tract. Manufacturing process development runs demonstrated consistent strain abundance across replicates, and HiPR-Vie analysis confirmed viable representation of all strains across runs.Conclusions KAN-001 is a rationally designed, defined LBP that enhances ICI response in multiple preclinical mouse models and exhibits robust manufacturing and analytical tractability. A Phase 1 clinical trial is planned in NSCLC patients with both ICI naïve and refractory cohorts. Primary endpoints will include safety and tolerability, with secondary assessments of engraftment and preliminary efficacy. KAN-001 will be administered orally in an encapsulated frozen liquid formulation with induction and maintenance dosing. Microbiome profiling will be performed throughout the trial to characterize host-microbiome interactions and identify potential response biomarkers.Acknowledgements We thank Nadim Ajami and Jennifer Wargo of the MD Anderson Cancer Center for their continued support of the KAN-001 program.Ethics Approval The in vivo mouse study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee (CIPA) and carried out in compliance with the Canadian Council at the CRCHUM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207