Novel insights into the genome organization of Rhizobiaceae: identification of linear plasmids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Members of the family Rhizobiaceae typically have multipartite genomes that are split between two or more replicons, including the chromosome and a variable number of extrachromosomal replicons (chromids and plasmids). Nearly all Rhizobiaceae replicons sequenced and described to date have a circular topology, except the linear chromid found in the genomes of most Agrobacterium spp. In this study, genomes of five non-pathogenic Agrobacterium strains and one plant tumourigenic Allorhizobium strain were fully sequenced. Surprisingly, genome analysis revealed that these six strains each carry an 80-kbp linear plasmid. Linear plasmids have so far not been identified in this bacterial family or other bacteria within the class Alphaproteobacteria . The ends of all six plasmids identified in this study have a hairpin structure with covalently closed ends. The plasmid sequences showed a high degree of homology, clearly indicating their common ancestry. Database searches led to the identification of additional linear plasmids in previously published Rhizobiaceae genome assemblies that were not previously recognized to have linear plasmids, suggesting that these replicons may be more widespread. Most likely, linear plasmids may be even more widely distributed than anticipated. Although the biological functions of the linear plasmids identified in this study remain unknown, they are associated with both non-pathogenic and plant tumourigenic Rhizobiaceae strains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".