Novel insights into the genome organization of Rhizobiaceae: identification of linear plasmids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2. Abstract Members of the family Rhizobiaceae typically have multipartite genomes, that are split between two or more replicons, including the chromosome and a variable number of extrachromosomal replicons (chromids and plasmids). Nearly all Rhizobiaceae replicons sequenced and described to date have a circular topology, with the exception of the linear chromid found in the genomes of most Agrobacterium spp. In this study, genomes of five nonpathogenic Agrobacterium strains and one plant tumorigenic Allorhizobium strain were fully sequenced. Surprisingly, genome analysis revealed that these six strains each carry an 80-kbp linear plasmid. Linear plasmids were so far not identified in this bacterial family or other bacteria within the class Alphaproteobacteria . The ends of all six plasmids identified in this study have a hairpin structure with covalently closed ends. The plasmid sequences showed a high degree of homology, clearly indicating their common ancestry. Database searches led to the identification of additional linear plasmids in previously published Rhizobiaceae genome assemblies that were not previously recognized to have linear plasmids, suggesting that these replicons may be more widespread. Most likely, linear plasmids may be even more widely distributed than anticipated. Although the biological functions of the linear plasmids identified in this study remain unknown, they are associated with both nonpathogenic and plant tumorigenic Rhizobiaceae strains. 3. Impact statement The family Rhizobiaceae includes some remarkable and important representatives, such as plant symbiotic bacteria (rhizobia) and plant pathogenic bacteria associated with neoplasia (agrobacteria). In this study, the complete genome sequences of six Rhizobiaceae strains were generated and their genome organizations were examined. Strikingly, our results showed that these six strains harbor a linear plasmid. Moreover, GenBank searches suggested that linear plasmids may be even more widespread in the family Rhizobiaceae . Linear plasmids may go undetected in genome sequencing studies if the assemblies are not specifically examined for linear plasmid. Overall, this study provides further evidence for the extraordinary genome plasticity of members of the family Rhizobiaceae and expands the taxonomic range in which linear plasmids have been identified. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of linear plasmids in the family Rhizobiaceae or the class Alphaproteobacteria . 4. Data summary The whole-genome sequences have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accessions CP192696 - CP192701 (Av2), CP000000 - CP000000 (rho-7.1), CP000000-CP000000 (rho-8.1), CP000000-CP000000 (rho-11.1), CP000000-CP000000 (rho-13.3), and CP000000-CP000000 (rho-14.1), within the BioProjects PRJNA557463 and PRJNA1009994. The raw sequencing reads were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the same BioProjects PRJNA557463 and PRJNA1009994: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA557463 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1009994 . NCBI submission for five genome sequences is undergoing processing and accession numbers will be added when available; in https://figshare.com/s/29a9e621adc1b66d0957
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".