Competitive fitness of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> against nasal commensals depends on biotin biosynthesis and acquisition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human nasal microbiome can serve as a reservoir for pathogens. In particular, the opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus aureus can be a member of the nasal microbiome increasing the risk of subsequent infections. The nasal carriage of S. aureus is known to be positively and negatively impacted by nonpathogenic species, suggesting interactions between the pathogen and commensals, but the underlying molecular mechanism remains largely unclear. Herein we demonstrate that S. aureus competes with nasal commensals for the coenzyme biotin. Biotin is crucial for all living organisms and we show that depletion of biotin impairs S. aureus growth and membrane integrity. We found the nasal cavity to be a biotin-limited environment, suggesting competition for the coenzyme within the microbiome. For some nasal commensals and S. aureus, we observed biotin prototrophy and all strains released biotin into the environment. In contrast, other commensals and especially coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were found to be biotin auxotrophs and strongly reliant on prototrophic strains under biotin-limited conditions. We show that high-affinity biotin uptake systems are used by prototrophic and auxotrophic strains alike and represent crucial factors to optimize competitive fitness of species in co-culture. Together, our data show that biotin-mediated interactions occur between the species of the human nasal microbiome and provide evidence for interspecies competition and co-dependency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".