MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415950053 · doi:10.1080/21645515.2025.2579335

Immune persistence and safety of the AS01 <sub>E</sub> -adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based vaccine in adults 50–59 years of age, including at-increased-risk adults: A randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4415950053 on OpenAlexaff
Murdo Ferguson, Tino F. Schwarz, Sebastián A Núñez, Juan Rodríguez‐García, Marek Mital, Carlos Zala, Bonavuth Pek, Bernhard Schmitt, Nicole Toursarkissian, Dolores Ochoa Mazarro, Josef Großkopf, Christine Voors‐Pette, Hemalini Mehta, Hiwot Amare Hailemariam, Catherine Gérard, Silvia Damaso, Marie‐Pierre David, D. Descamps, Judith Hill, Corinne Vandermeulen, Veronica Hulstrøm

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsCegep regional de Lanaudiere
FundersGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsImmunogenicityAdverse effectVaccinationRandomized controlled trialPlaceboImmune systemVirusCohortImmunity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled multi-country study, the AS01E-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (adjuvanted RSVPreF3) was immunologically non-inferior at 1 month post-vaccination in adults 50–59 years of age (YOA) compared to adults ≥60 YOA, in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated. Here, we report end-of-study immunogenicity and safety results until 12 months post-vaccination. Participants 50–59 YOA were divided into an at-increased-risk (AIR) and a non-AIR subcohort, each randomized (2:1) to receive one dose of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 or placebo. A control cohort of participants ≥60 YOA received adjuvanted RSVPreF3. Humoral/cell-mediated immunity and safety were assessed. In total, 1152 participants 50–59 YOA received adjuvanted RSVPreF3 or placebo, and 381 participants ≥60 YOA received adjuvanted RSVPreF3. In all vaccinated groups, RSV-A and RSV-B neutralizing titers and RSVPreF3-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell frequencies increased at 1 month post-vaccination and declined thereafter, but remained above baseline and placebo levels at 6 and 12 months post-vaccination. During the study, one vaccine-related serious adverse event (cold-type hemolytic anemia in a participant ≥60 YOA) was reported. Five participants died (all in the 50–59 YOA AIR subcohort, four had received adjuvanted RSVPreF3, one placebo); none of the deaths were considered vaccine-related. In conclusion, adjuvanted RSVPreF3 induced a humoral and cell-mediated immune response persisting until at least 12 months post-vaccination in adults 50–59 YOA, including those at increased risk for RSV disease. The vaccine had an acceptable 12-month safety profile in adults 50–59 YOA, consistent with that in adults ≥60 YOA.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05590403

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207