MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415971716 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.04.25339335

Elenagen, a p62/SQSTM1-encoding plasmid, improves overall survival in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients: a phase II trial

2025· preprint· W4415971716 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Baranau, Evgeny Bakin, S. Polyakov, Olga Streltsova, Ekaterina Zharkova, Aliona Filimonava, Gabriel Levin, Vladimir L. Gabai, Alexander Shneider

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGemcitabineClinical endpointOvarian cancerOverall survivalSurvival analysisPhases of clinical researchClinical trialChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer remains a major therapeutic challenge, with limited benefit from currently available cytotoxic agents. Elenagen is a newly developed plasmid DNA–based anticancer agent that encodes p62/SQSTM1 protein, a multifunctional adaptor protein involved in selective autophagy, signal transduction, and modulation of the inflammatory response. We previously reported the progression-free survival outcomes of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated with Elenagen. We report the overall survival results from a phase II randomized controlled trial comparing Elenagen plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. Methods This open-label, prospective, randomized, two-center study enrolled women with platinum resistant ovarian cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gemcitabine monotherapy (1,000 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or gemcitabine plus Elenagen (2.5 mg intramuscularly weekly). The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included safety, post-progression outcomes, and time-dependent analyses of Elenagen exposure. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Thirty patients (15 per arm) were evaluable for overall survival. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were balanced between groups. Among patients with elevated CA-125 levels (>35 U/mL), median overall survival was 13 months (95% CI, 10–27) in the gemcitabine arm and 25 months (95% CI, 17–not reached) in the Elenagen plus gemcitabine arm (log-rank p = .031). Treatment with Elenagen was associated with a 59% reduction in the risk of death (HR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18–0.94; p = .036). Time-dependent and landmark analyses demonstrated a positive association between longer Elenagen exposure and improved survival (p<.001). No additional safety signals were observed compared with gemcitabine alone. Post-progression survival and subsequent therapy patterns were comparable between arms. Conclusions The addition of Elenagen to gemcitabine significantly prolonged overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer without increasing toxicity. Trial registration NCT05979298, 2023-08-07

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy→French-language works237,207→