MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415992105 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2504187

Oral Icotrokinra for Plaque Psoriasis in Adults and Adolescents

2025· article· en· W4415992105 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Bissonnette, Jennifer Soung, Adelaide A. Hebert, Andrew Pink, Andreas Pinter, Angela Moore, Yuling Shi, Wenhui Wang, Darryl Toth, Megan Miller-Kassamali, Joseph Cafone, Jingzhi Jiang, Shu Li, Cynthia Marie Carver DeKlotz, Fabio P. Nunes, Mark Lebwohl

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsXLV Diagnostics (Canada)Probity Medical ResearchInnovaderm (Canada)
FundersJohnson and Johnson
KeywordsPlaque psoriasisPlaceboPsoriasisIncidence (geometry)PeptideClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Icotrokinra, a targeted oral peptide that selectively binds the interleukin-23 receptor, is under investigation for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving adults and adolescents (≥12 years of age) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, as defined by all the following: a total body-surface area of psoriasis involvement of at least 10%, a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of at least 12 (range, 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating a greater extent or severity of psoriasis), and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of at least 3 (range, 0 [clear skin] to 4 [severe disease]). Participants were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive icotrokinra at a dose of 200 mg once daily through week 24 or placebo through week 16 followed by transition to icotrokinra. The coprimary end points were an IGA 0/1 response (IGA score of 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline) and a PASI 90 response (≥90% reduction from baseline in the PASI score) at week 16. RESULTS: A total of 684 participants underwent randomization (456 to the icotrokinra group and 228 to the placebo group). At week 16, a total of 65% of the participants receiving icotrokinra and 8% of those receiving placebo had an IGA 0/1 response, and 50% and 4%, respectively, had a PASI 90 response (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Complete clearance of skin at week 16 was significantly more likely with icotrokinra than with placebo (IGA score of 0, 33% vs. 1%; PASI 100 response [100% reduction from baseline in the PASI score], 27% vs. <1%; P<0.001 for both comparisons). The percentage of participants with at least one adverse event through week 16 was 49% in each group; the most common adverse events in each group were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection. The exposure-adjusted incidence of adverse events was consistent through week 24. CONCLUSIONS: : Targeted Oral Peptide Icotrokinra for Psoriasis Involving High‑Impact Sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of MedicineSame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207