MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416017904 · doi:10.1177/10507256251390871

Core Outcome Set of the Surgical Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: International Consensus by Delphi Study

2025· article· en· W4416017904 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniël J. van de Berg, Menno R. Vriens, Hanneke M. van Santen, Angelique Seur, Sarah Clement, A S Paul van Trotsenburg, Eveline Bruinstroop, Schelto Kruijff, Robin P. Peeters, Frederik A. Verburg, Romana T. Netea‐Maier, Faridi S. van Etten‐Jamaludin, Els J.�M. Nieveen van Dijkum, Joep P. M. Derikx, Anton F. Engelsman

Bibliographic record

VenueThyroid · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCancer Center AmsterdamUniversité de SfaxDebreceni EgyetemUniversità degli Studi di MessinaUniversità di PisaUniversità degli Studi di BresciaUniversità degli Studi di TorinoNational Cancer InstituteHospices Civils de LyonHospital for Sick ChildrenUniverzita Karlova v PrazeUniversità degli Studi di CagliariCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisUniversità di CataniaSorbonne UniversitéUniversità degli Studi di MilanoVrije Universiteit BrusselSaint Petersburg State UniversityVšeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v PrazeOdense UniversitetshospitalIstituto Auxologico ItalianoInstitut Gustave-RoussyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAristotle University of ThessalonikiUniversità degli Studi di PaviaUniversiteit UtrechtUniversité de LausanneUniversidad de NavarraNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensKarolinska InstitutetMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversità degli Studi di SienaRijksuniversiteit GroningenYale UniversityAmsterdam University Medical Centerslékařská fakulta Univerzity KarlovyLeids Universitair Medisch CentrumUniversiteit LeidenUniversità Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila
KeywordsDelphi methodStakeholderDelphiOutcome (game theory)GuidelineLikert scaleSet (abstract data type)Inclusion (mineral)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: No international consensus exists on the selection and reporting of outcomes after differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) surgery, hindering assessment of new treatments and guideline formation. Therefore, we aimed to develop an international core outcome set (COS) to be measured and reported in future studies investigating surgical treatment for DTC, as well as in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.219
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThyroidSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207