Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents With Severe Alopecia Areata: Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 3 Program (UP-AA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONCLUSIONSIn 24-week, placebo-controlled period (Period A) of Study 1 and Study 2 of the phase 3 UP-AA program, both UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg demonstrated superior and high degrees of efficacy in adults and adolescents with severe AA, compared with placebo The safety profile of both doses of UPA in Period A was generally consistent with that observed in approved indicationsThe efficacy, safety, and tolerability of UPA in adult and adolescent patients with severe AA will be further evaluated in the ongoing UP-AA phase 3 clinical program To obtain a PDF of this poster Scan QR code or use the following link to download an electronic version of this presentation and other AbbVie Fall Clinical 2025 scientific presentations https://abbvie1.outsystemsenterprise.com/CongressPublications/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".