MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416141370 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0350

CSIG-16. CIC-FUSION ONCOPROTEINS COOPERATE WITH JAK/STAT1/3 SIGNALING TO DRIVE CIC-REARRANGED SARCOMA

2025· article· en· W4416141370 on OpenAlexaff
Ramneet Kaloti, Rebecca A. Gladdy, David G. Kirsch, Severa Bunda, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscription factorEffectorHistoneFusion proteinSTAT1PromoterTranscription (linguistics)H3K4me3

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract CIC-rearranged sarcoma (CRS) is a rare disease driven by a specific fusion protein involving the CIC gene. The occurrence in the brain is 3% in all CRS patients, and these tumors frequently metastasize to the brain. The most common rearrangement is with the double homeobox 4 (DUX4) transcription factor (CIC-DUX4), and others, such as CIC-NUTM1 fusions, have been identified in a subset of pediatric primitive neuroectodermal tumors. However, the molecular mechanisms by which CIC-fusions drive CRS remain unknown. Preliminary data show that CIC-DUX4/NUTM1 fusions activate JAK and its downstream effector STAT1/3. We hypothesize that JAK/STAT1/3 signaling cooperates with CIC-fusions to drive CIC-sarcomas by inducing ETV1/4/5 expression. Patient-derived CRS cell lines showed elevated levels of JAK1/STAT1/3 activation compared to fusion-negative sarcoma lines. Inhibition of JAK1 using Ruxolitinib and Solicitinib reduced STAT1/3 phosphorylation, downregulated ETV1/4/5 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, and diminished ETV5 promoter activity, cell proliferation, and tumorigenicity. Although the mechanism by which CIC-fusions activate oncogenic targets is still under investigation, histone acetylation appears to play a central role. STAT1/3 interacts with p300/CBP to enhance transcription, and STAT1 is necessary for p300 acetyltransferase activity. Ruxolitinib significantly reduced histone acetylation at ETV1/4/5 promoters in hMSC cells expressing CIC-DUX4/NUTM1, as well as in CRS cell lines. Unlike the p300 inhibitor C646, which causes global hypoacetylation, Ruxolitinib’s effects were promoter-specific, indicating its potential as a more targeted and less toxic therapeutic option. Importantly, we found that STAT1/3 binds to ETV1/4/5 promoters only in the presence of CIC-fusions. Luciferase assays confirmed that STAT1/3 alone cannot activate ETV5 transcription without CIC-fusions, revealing a novel cooperative mechanism. In vivo, Ruxolitinib treatment of CRS xenografts led to significant reductions in tumor volume, STAT1/3 activation, and ETV1/4/5 expression. These findings support JAK1/STAT1/3 inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy for CRS and warrant further preclinical investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→