QBOi El Niño–Southern Oscillation experiments: teleconnections of the QBO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. This study investigates Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) teleconnections and their modulation by the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) using a multi-model ensemble from the Atmospheric Processes And their Role in Climate (APARC) QBO initiative (QBOi). Analyzing observed QBO–ENSO teleconnections is challenging because it is difficult to separate the respective influences of QBO and ENSO outside the QBO region due to aliasing in the historical record. To isolate these signals, simulations were conducted with annually repeating prescribed sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) representing idealized El Niño and La Niña conditions (the QBOi EN and LN experiments, respectively), and results are compared with the QBOi control experiment (CTL) under ENSO-neutral conditions. The strength of the Holton-Tan relationship between the phase of the QBO and the strength of the polar vortex seen in observations is reproduced in fewer than three models in CTL and by one model in EN. In LN, three out of nine models reproduce the observed Holton–Tan relationship, but with less than half of the observed amplitude. In the Arctic winter climate, sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) occur more frequently in EN than in LN; however, unlike in observations, there is no discernible difference in SSW frequency between QBO westerly (QBO-W) and QBO easterly (QBO-E) phases. The Asia-Pacific subtropical jet (APJ) shifts significantly equatorward during QBO-W compared to QBO-E in observations, but this shift is not robust across models, regardless of ENSO phases. In the tropics, the sign and spatial pattern of the QBO precipitation response vary widely across models and experiments, indicating that any potential QBO signal is strongly modulated by the prevailing ENSO phases. Overall, the QBOi models exhibit unrealistically weak QBO wind amplitudes in the lower stratosphere, which may explain the weak polar vortex and APJ responses, as well as the weak precipitation signals in the tropics. In contrast, the QBO teleconnection with the Walker circulation during boreal summer and autumn shows consistent signals in both observations and most models. Specifically, the QBO-W phase is characterized by upper-level westerly and lower-level easterly anomalies over the Indian Ocean–Maritime Continent relative to QBO-E, although the amplitude and timing of these anomalies remain model-dependent. Notably, the influence of QBO phase on the Walker circulation appears insensitive to the ENSO phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".