Distinct Morphokinetic Signature of Human Embryos with Chromosomal Mosaicism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether chromosomal mosaicism in blastocysts is associated with a distinct morphokinetic signature. Methods: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was performed on 182 human embryos via trophectoderm biopsy on day 5 and analyzed by next-generation sequencing. Embryos were classified as euploid (n = 55), mosaic (n = 39: 21 low-grade, 18 high-grade), or aneuploid (n = 88), of which 18 with concurrent mosaicism. Prior to biopsy, embryos were cultured in a time-lapse system (EmbryoScope), and 12 morphokinetic parameters were assessed, including pronuclei fading (tPNf), cleavage times (t2–t9), morula formation (tM), blastulation start (tSB), and full blastocyst formation (tB). These parameters were compared according to ploidy status. Results: Patients with euploid and mosaic embryos were comparable in terms of maternal age, ART indication and embryo quality (p > 0.05). In contrast, aneuploid embryos were obtained from older patients and had lower morphological grades. Mosaic embryos showed delayed tPNf (24.8 ± 6.5 vs. 22.8 ± 2.3 h, p = 0.03) and t2 (27.6 ± 6.6 vs. 25.4 ± 2.5 h, p = 0.02) compared to euploid embryos, mainly attributable to low-grade mosaic embryos. Whole-chromosome mosaicism, but not segmental mosaicism, was associated with delayed embryo development at several intermediate cleavage time points (t3, t4, t6, t7 and t9). Aneuploid embryos showed significant delays at later stages versus euploid embryos, particularly aneuploid embryos with mosaicism at t7 (56.6 ± 8.3 vs. 52 ± 5.6 h, p = 0.02), t8 (59.1 ± 9.6 vs. 54.8 ± 6.7 h, p = 0.04), tM (90.3 ± 7.7 vs. 83.6 ± 8.2 h, p = 0.006) and tB (113.0 ± 11.6 vs. 106.6 ± 8.9 h, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Mosaic embryos exhibit delays in early development (tPNf, t2) but reach later morphokinetic milestones at rates similar to euploid embryos. In contrast, aneuploid embryos, especially those with mosaicism, exhibit marked developmental delays at later stages (t7, t8, tM, tB).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".