MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416454285 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.20.25340644

Effectiveness of the TYPHIBEV® (Vi-CRM197 conjugate) vaccine introduction in Nepal: a test-negative, case-control study

2025· preprint· en· W4416454285 on OpenAlexaff
Dipesh Tamrakar, Esther Jung, Pratibha Bista Roka, Rabin Sharma Pokharel, Ram Hari Chapagain, Akhil Tamrakhar, Surendra K. Mahadup, Rajeev Shrestha, Kate Doyle, Isaac I. Bogoch, Stephen P. Luby, Denise O. Garrett, Wirongrong Cheirakul, Jason R. Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTyphoid feverTyphoid vaccineVaccinationImmunizationImmunogenicityOdds ratioSalmonella typhiConditional logistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Typhoid fever, caused by Salmonella Typhi, remains a major cause of global morbidity and mortality. TYPHIBEV®, a Vi-CRM197 typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV), received WHO prequalification based on immunogenicity data, but there have been no published data on clinical efficacy or effectiveness. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TYPHIBEV®, which was introduced through a catch-up campaign and routine immunization in Nepal, in preventing blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever among children. Methods We conducted a test-negative, case-control study where typhoid test-positive cases were defined as vaccine-eligible pediatric patients who tested positive for Salmonella Typhi by blood culture at participating health facilities and test-negative controls were vaccine-eligible patients who tested negative for S . Typhi on blood cultures. We matched by age, location, date of blood culture, and surveillance site. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR), and vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 1-OR. Results Between October 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024, 40 typhoid cases and 113 matched, test-negative controls were enrolled. Both cases and controls were similar in sociodemographic characteristics and water, sanitation and hygiene-related living conditions. Among 39 cases and 108 controls with known vaccine status, 20 cases (51%) and 91 controls (84%) had received TCV. Vaccine effectiveness was 89% (95% CI: 65-97%) and was lower among children <5 years (72%, 95% CI: -203-97%) compared with those 5-15 years (98%, 95% CI: 80-100%). Vaccine effectiveness estimates did not significantly differ when restricted to participants with documented vaccination status. Conclusion The findings indicate that TYPHIBEV® was highly effective in preventing typhoid fever up to 30 months following a national introduction, with effectiveness estimates comparable to those observed for Typbar-TCV®.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology→French-language works237,207→