A novel protocol for protoplast isolation, transfection, and culture in Cannabis sativa L
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protoplasts are a valuable tool for studying gene expression and applying genome editing techniques. Given the high medicinal and industrial potential of Cannabis sativa L., developing an efficient protoplast-to-plant regeneration protocol is highly desirable. Due to its recalcitrant nature, a complete plant regeneration from cannabis protoplasts has not yet been achieved. This study details a robust protocol for cannabis protoplast isolation, purification, transient transfection, and culture, additionally reporting somatic embryo-like structures derived from protoplast-derived callus. We demonstrated that the age of donor material, the composition of the enzyme solution, and the duration of enzymolysis are crucial for efficient protoplast isolation. Protoplast embedding, coupled with a rich culture medium and plant growth regulators, proved critical for initiating cell wall re-synthesis, cell division, and microcallus formation. Protoplasts isolated using the reported protocol were abundant (2.2 × 106 protoplasts/1 g of fresh weight), viable (78.8% viability) and able to undergo cell wall re-synthesis (56.1% of viable cells), followed by cell divisions (15.8% plating efficiency). Polyethylene glycol-mediated transfection yielded a 28% transfection efficiency and 17% plating efficiency in 10-day cultures. Protoplast-derived microcalli successfully proliferated on six regeneration media containing various concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine and thidiazuron, exhibiting further proliferation and greening within two months. This system provides a reliable protocol for isolation, transfection and culture of cannabis protoplasts. It also offers a framework for investigating gene function, as well as advancing protoplast fusion and genome editing technologies for this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".