MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416630637 · doi:10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100409

Plasma genotyping to identify novel resistance variants in advanced NSCLC(DISCOVER): Non-AGA report

2025· article· en· W4416630637 on OpenAlexaff
B. Suárez, Abdulrahman Alghabban, Maryam Safi, Mary Rose Rabey, Lisa W. Le, Tong Zhang, Peter Sabatini, Shamini Selvarajah, Tracy Stockley, Natasha B. Leighl

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Liquid Biopsy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsGenotypingGenotypeMutationGeneDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results: A total of 807 LBs were performed in 791 patients (51.3% female; median age 63.5; ECOG 1 90.4%; stage IV 84.3%).Tumor types included thoracic (46%), gastrointestinal (19%), breast (10%), gynecologic (7%), and others.Overall, 67.3% of LBs were informative, with a median turnaround of 11 days.Informativeness was higher in metastatic vs non-metastatic disease (71% vs 47%, p<0.001) and in progressive vs non-progressive patients (70% vs 39%, p<0.001).ESCAT I/II alterations were found in 37%, including 30.8% of those progressing without prior molecular findings (16.4% ESCAT I).MTB recommended targeted therapy in 25.6% (50% trials, 34% standard, 16% compassionate use).CH variants were detected in 91.5% of patients, most frequently in DNMT3A (69.76%),TP53 (34.94%),CHEK2 (29.98%),ATM (25%), TET2 (16.60%), and ASXL1 (10%).After CH exclusion, 81.7% (646 patients) remained informative, with actionable findings remaining at 37%.Suspected germline variants were identified in 5.9% overall.Conclusions: PRECISO provides a comprehensive pan-tumor real-world dataset integrating LB with MTB recommendations and systematic CH filtering.LB was feasible and clinically informative, supporting therapy recommendations in onefourth of patients.Although CH was highly prevalent, it did not alter actionable ESCAT detection.To our knowledge, this is among the largest prospective pantumor series systematically applying CH filtering in an MTB setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Liquid BiopsySame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207