MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417004914 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1048

Lipid nanoparticle-mediated epitope editing in human HSPCs enables resistance to CD45-directed CAR-T cell therapy

2025· article· en· W4417004914 on OpenAlexaff
C Y Li, Vilas Desai, Elahe Kamali Ghahe, Davin Tafuri, Rujul Jagdish Deolikar, Natalie Cooper, Nils Wellhausen, Feng Shen, Reka Geczy, Aruna D. Balgi, Samuel Clarke, Jennifer Moody, Anne Chew, Carl H. June, Saar Gill, Friederike Herbst

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitopeElectroporationHaematopoiesisEx vivoStem cellGenome editingProgenitor cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract CD45-directed CAR-T cells (CART45) are a promising immunotherapy for a broad range of hematologic malignancies, given the pan-leukocyte expression of CD45. However, their clinical use is limited by cytotoxicity against normal hematopoietic cells expressing CD45. Epitope editing of CD45 in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) offers a strategy to protect the normal hematopoietic system from CART45-mediated pancytopenia. While electroporation (EP) is widely used for CRISPR-based gene editing in HSPCs, it involves physical manipulation of cells and can reduce viability and function, particularly in primitive hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) offer a non-viral, RNA-based delivery alternative that operates through endocytic uptake and membrane fusion, providing a gentle, scalable, and GMP-compatible platform. Although LNPs have been successfully used in other cell types, their use for ex vivo gene editing of human HSPCs remains limited. This study directly compares the editing efficiency of a Cas9-derived adenine base editor (ABE) targeting the CD45 epitope in human HSPCs delivered via LNP versus EP. To compile a preclinical data package for potential future clinical translation, we evaluated how each delivery method affects HSPC viability and preservation of stem cell properties such as multi-lineage differentiation and engraftment in immunodeficient mice. Human CD34⁺ HSPCs were edited ex vivo with an ABE and a guide RNA targeting the relevant CD45 epitope to install a non-synonymous mutation, delivered via either EP or LNP. Editing efficiency, colony-forming units, and immunophenotypic HSCs showed comparable results between both methods ex vivo. While electroporation achieved slightly higher editing efficiency, LNP delivery preserved cell viability, reaching a 1.5-fold increase in cell recovery relative to EP at 48 hours post-editing. Functional human HSC frequency, as determined by limiting dilution analysis (LDA) in immunodeficient mice (n=45) with equal serially diluted cell doses, was comparable between the two delivery methods. The estimated frequency of functional HSCs among the cells injected was 1 in 81,089 for EP- and 1 in 80,915 for LNP-mediated delivery. These findings indicate that the delivery of the base editing machinery via LNP supports long-term engraftment of HSCs at a similar level to EP. Both groups of cells gave rise to multilineage hematopoiesis in peripheral blood and long-term engraftment in bone marrow, assessed until 28 weeks in primary recipients. Both delivery methods achieved efficient and stable epitope editing, with editing efficiencies of 95% for EP and 81% for LNP before transplantation, which was maintained at 87% for EP and 78% for LNP post-transplantation. Furthermore, donor-matched CART45 cells selectively eliminated unedited cells while preserving edited hematopoietic populations using either EP or LNP delivery, both in ex vivo and in vivo settings. The total number of cells in the bone marrow derived from edited HSPCs was approximately 300-fold higher than that of unedited cells. This demonstrates that epitope-edited hematopoietic cells are effectively shielded from CAR-T cell-mediated cell killing. These findings demonstrate that our developed process using LNP-mediated base editing of CD45 enables highly efficient gene editing in HSPCs, improving cell recovery, preserving long-term HSC function, and simplifying the manufacturing process compared to EP. In addition, CD45-edited HSPCs via LNP are protected from CAR-T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. This pre-clinical LNP delivery process offers a clinically scalable alternative to electroporation for genetic engineering of HSPCs with potential applicability across a broad spectrum of hematologic malignancies and diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering→French-language works237,207→