MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417004958 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1030

Antigen-dependent clonal sweep with sequential or combinatory anti-myeloma T cell engagers

2025· article· en· W4417004958 on OpenAlexaff
Holly Lee, Sungwoo Ahn, Deeksha Vishwamitra, Sheri Skerget, Mansour Poorebrahim, Noémie Leblay, Elham Hasheminasabgo, Sacha Benaoudia, David Jung, Sejal Chikhale, Kostantina Taouxi, Hermann Einsele, Efstathios Kastritis, Marc S. Raab, Francesco Maura, Leo Rasche, Jill Corre, Hervé Avet‐Loiseau, Paola Neri, Nizar J. Bahlis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntigenMutationBone marrowFlow cytometryT cellChimeric antigen receptorMultiple myelomaImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bispecific T cell engagers (TCE) have led to significant therapeutic advances in multiple myeloma (MM), however with finite durability of response. Growing evidence implicates TNFRSF17 (BCMA) and GPRC5D antigenic escape as key mechanism of TCE failure. However, more data is needed to i) accurately define the true prevalence of antigen escape, ii) delineate the phylogenetic processes and mutational drivers of these events and iii) elucidate the role of sequential versus combinatorial targeting of myeloma antigens in mitigating immune evasion. To comprehensively profile the genomic events underlying TCE relapse, we collected serial bone marrow biopsies from MM patients (n=64) treated with anti-BCMA (n=38), -GPRC5D (n=23), or -FcRL5 (n=4) TCEs sequentially with and without anti-CD38 antibodies. Sorted CD138+ cells were subjected to bulk whole genome sequencing (WGS 100x), scRNA-seq and flow cytometry analysis. Among 33 cases of post anti-BCMA TCE relapse and excluding primary refractory disease, 67.7% demonstrated TNFRSF17 genomic alterations. TNFRSF17 events included i) BCMA extracellular domain (ECD) mutations + monoallelic TNFRSF17 deletion (n=6), ii) BCMA ECD mutations only (n=5), iii) TNFRSF17 biallelic deletion (n=8), and iv) TNFRSF17 monoallelic deletion (n=2). Detected TNFRSF17 mutations localized exclusively to BCMA extracellular domains and revealed recurrent mutational hotspots including p.Pro34del (n=6), p.Ser30Phe (n=3), p.Gln25ter (n=2), and single cases of p.Arg27Pro, p.Arg27Gln, p.Ser30del, p.Gln7ter, p.Ser48ter, and p.Thr32Ser. Notably, genomically divergent BCMA ECD mutant subclones were simultaneously detected in 4 cases including MM-17 (p.Pro34del + p.Ser30del), MM-51 (p.Gln25ter + p.Gln7ter + p.Ser30Phe), MM-52 (p.Gln25ter + p.Ser30Phe + p.Pro34del), and MM-79 (p.Ser30Phe + p.Pro34del). Similarly, antigenic drift involving GPRC5D through copy number deletions, SNVs/indels, or epigenetic regulation was observed in 68.4% of relapsed cases following talquetamab treatment. Dual antigen escape was observed in patients treated with sequential anti-BCMA and GPRC5D TCEs, as well as those who also received TCE in combination with anti-CD38 antibodies. Phylogenetic studies of these cases often revealed a clonal sweep driven by the TCE immunotherapeutic bottleneck with the emergence of single clone disease at progression. This is illustrated in patient MM-03, with a clonal TNFRSF17 p.Arg27Pro mutation detected at progression from elranatamab, followed by two phased mutations in GPRC5D including p.Asp239Asn (VAF 47%) and p.Trp237Ter (VAF 36%) on progression from talquetamab, daratumumab and pomalidomide (Talq-DP) in the immediate next line of therapy. Functional profiling confirmed the disruption of elranatmab and teclistamab binding to mutant BCMA p.Arg27Pro, and analysis of the GPRC5D p.Asp239Asn mutant demonstrated ~275 fold increase in talquetamab logIC50 relative to wtGPRC5D. Notably, this GPRC5D mutant clone retained the clonal TNFRSF17 p.Arg27Pro mutation consistent with a common single ancestral phylogeny and a clonal sweep post TCEs. Of interest, mutational signature analysis (mmsig) of CD138+ tumor cells prior to and post each TCE therapy demonstrated a dominant hyper-APOBEC signature (SBS2/SBS13 73%) consistent with its likely mutagenic contribution to antigenic escape. Double and triple antigenic loss involving BCMA, GPRC5D, and CD38 were also observed in patients (n=4) treated sequentially or in combination immunotherapies targeting these antigens. Serial WGS analysis consistently demonstrated an increase in mutational burden at relapse post TCE-based therapies. dN/dScv analysis was performed at progression to define drivers of TCE resistance. Surprisingly, this analysis revealed a strong positive enrichment only for nonsynonymous mutations of targeted antigens rather than that of common oncogenic drivers (with the exception of TP53 and NRAS), consistent with an antigen escape model of TCE clonal sweep. High prevalence of target antigen escape at progression is confirmed in this large cohort of TCE-treated MM patients. Importantly, multi-target antigen loss is also noted with sequential or combination immunotherapy-based regimens. These observations, marked by the absence of enrichment for hallmark oncogenic driver mutations at relapse but rather the emergence of ‘antigen-null’ clonal sweeps, support a finite, response adapted, TCE administration to limit immune sculpting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→