MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417120229 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.04.25340995

Development and Validation of Minimal Disease Activity, Disease Flare, and Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Children with Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis Using a Consensus and Data-Driven Approach

2025· article· W4417120229 on OpenAlexaff
Farzana Nuruzzaman, Natalie Rosenwaser, Xing Wang, Jonathan Akikusa, Matthew L. Basiaga, Ian Muse, Erin Balay‐Dustrude, Megan Nguyen, Emily Deng, Aleksander Lenert, Lindsey Bergstrom, Fatma Dedeoğlu, Bin Huang, Sivia Lapidus, Tzielan Lee, Cassandra M. Levesque, Lillian Lim, Kimberly Martin, Elizabeth Murray, Melissa Oliver, Karen Onel, Seza Özen, Lauren Potts, Sara Stern, Robin Villaverda, Enxi Wu, Ronald M. Laxer, Polly J. Ferguson, Daniel J. Lovell, Yongdong Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteomyelitis and Bone Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimal clinically important differenceDiseaseClinical trialObservational studyCohortMEDLINECohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives To create definitions for minimal disease activity (MDA), flare, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO). It is necessary to establish these criteria prior to starting clinical effectiveness trials for therapies in CNO. Methods Three separate cohorts samples from an international observational CNO registry were presented to a panel of twenty experts in CNO, including 7 patients/caregivers via online and in-person voting using nominal group technique to define MDA, flare, and MCID, respectively. Experts classified the cases in each cohort as meeting the state for that specific cohort, ie. MDA or not, or flare or not, or meeting MCID or not. A consensus of ⩾80% was required. Results General surveys identified the most important variables to include to define MDA, flare, and MCID. Clinical improvement of 30% or more in these critical parameters and improvement of CNO Clinical Disease Activity Score (CDAS) by at least 3 were considered meaningful by providers and consensus data. Conclusions This study provides the preliminary definitions of MDA, disease flare, and MCID in CNO which can serve as targets and potential outcomes from treatments. These definitions must now be validated in other cohorts and tested in clinical trials. Key Messages WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC Measurements of minimal disease activity (MDA), worsening disease activity (‘flare’), and minimally clinically important differences (MCID) in CNO are not well-established. For successful execution of clinical trials to identify effective treatment strategies in patients with CNO, standardized definitions of these terms are necessary. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Using data from an international real-world registry of CNO patients, we developed and validated quantitative definitions for MDA, flare, and MCID. HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY Definitions of MDA, flare, and MCID will serve as potential outcomes in future clinical trials to study effectiveness of therapies in CNO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicOsteomyelitis and Bone Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207