Clinical characteristics, management, and hematopoietic cell transplantation of patients with TLR8 gain-of-function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) gain-of-function (GOF) somatic variants were recently identified as causing severe neutropenia, lymphoproliferation, and immune dysregulation. We report the expanded clinical and laboratory phenotype and management of 10 patients, including the original cohort of 6 male patients. We identify the first female patient with TLR8 GOF who presented during infancy with pure red cell aplasia due to a germ line TLR8 variant, and 2 new disease-causing somatic variants in male patients. Eight patients had somatic mosaicism with peripheral blood variant allele fractions of 7% to 26%, and age of disease onset of 9 months to 28 years. All patients had neutropenia, most with severe neutropenia refractory to medical therapy. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were common. Bone marrow characteristically demonstrated severe myeloid hypoplasia and activated T-cell infiltrates and/or aggregates. An increased number of large granular lymphocytes (LGLs) was identified in 5 patients. Seven patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). High rates of post-HCT cytopenia of unclear etiology and graft-versus-host disease were observed. Five patients are surviving at 1 to 3 years after HCT with full donor myeloid and T-cell chimerism, and resolution of disease phenotype. The 2 patients who presented during childhood and did not undergo HCT ultimately died from disease. In conclusion, TLR8 GOF is an X-linked dominant disorder that should be considered in male and female patients with cytopenia, particularly severe neutropenia, lymphoproliferation with immune dysregulation, increased LGLs, and new to this cohort, red cell aplasia. Disease is refractory to medical management, and curative, allogeneic HCT should be considered early after diagnosis. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04339777.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".