MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417223543 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.114405

A stiffness-gated YAP-β-catenin axis orchestrates AXIN2 expression in metastatic breast cancer

2025· article· en· W4417223543 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuning Wu, Zhi Su, Chang Ge, Shumaim Barooj, Jeremy A. Hirota, Fei Geng

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster University
FundersMitacsGenome Canada
KeywordsExtracellular matrixBreast cancerWnt signaling pathwayMatrigelAXIN2CytoskeletonMechanotransductionCancer cellMetastasisCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer progression is strongly influenced by the mechanical properties of the tumor microenvironment, yet how extracellular matrix stiffness coordinates signaling between YAP and β-catenin remains unclear. Using breast cancer cells cultured on soft and stiff 2D substrates and 3D Matrigel spheroids, we show that the rigid matrices drive joint nuclear localization of YAP and β-catenin, whereas compliant environments reveal a compensatory increase in β-catenin nuclear entry following YAP depletion. However, this increase is insufficient to activate canonical Wnt targets, and AXIN2 emerges as a stiffness-sensitive gene requiring cooperative input from both regulators. Cytoskeletal tension and cell density further tune this interplay, indicating that mechanical and architectural cues jointly govern nuclear signaling. In 3D culture, YAP loss reduces β-catenin nuclear localization and spheroid viability in a stiffness-dependent manner. These findings identify a mechanically gated YAP-β-catenin axis that integrates multiple microenvironmental cues to shape transcriptional programs in metastatic breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207