MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417223706 · doi:10.1186/s12940-025-01250-y

Burden of disease attributable to PM2.5 at low exposure levels: impact of methodological choices

2025· article· en· W4417223706 on OpenAlexaff
Heli Lehtomäki, Gunn Marit Aasvang, Gerhard Sulo, Bruce Denby, Otto Hänninen, Gavin Pereira, Omid Dadras, Anette Kocbach Bølling

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNorwegian Institute of Public Health
KeywordsComparabilityBurden of diseaseDisease burdenAttributable riskRisk assessmentPublic healthQuality-adjusted life year

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Exposure to fine particles (PM 2.5 ) has been associated with adverse health outcomes, even at low exposure levels (< 10 µg/m 3 ). Burden of disease assessments can quantify these associations; however, their sensitivity to methodological choices limits comparability between studies. Methods This study aimed to quantify the impact of methodological choices on disease burden attributable to low levels of ambient PM 2.5 , using Norway as a case study. Key methodological choices included (i) population exposure data, (ii) concentration-response curves, and (iii) population health data. Data from national and international sources were applied, including the global burden of disease (GBD) study. Attributable mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) were estimated using burden of disease methodology. Additionally, the impact of choices related to concentration-response curves was assessed for higher exposure levels, using a scenario where exposure distributions were shifted to mean exposures up to 30 µg/m 3 . Results Methodological choices related to the concentration-response curves had the largest impacts on the estimated attributable deaths, ranging from − 91% to 104% change relative to the reference estimate (1,448 deaths, 95% CI 502–1497). These choices had a smaller impact on higher exposure levels, varying from − 46% to 53%. The choice of exposure and population health data led to 40% differences in attributable death estimates. DALYs attributable to PM 2.5 were predominantly driven by years of life lost (YLL: 74%). The choice of relative risk (RR) for the concentration response curve caused around 30% variation in DALY estimates relative to the reference (11,730 DALYs; 5,980 − 16,790), with larger differences for ischemic heart disease (-44 to 79%). Conclusion Attributable burden estimates for PM 2.5 are highly sensitive to key methodological choices, particularly at low exposure levels. Consequently, transparent reporting of the methodological choices and data sources in PM 2.5 health risk assessments are required to improve comparability and facilitate interpretations of the burden estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental HealthSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207