MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417315601 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c09235

Simultaneous Determination of Lyso-Gb1 and Lyso-Gb3 in Plasma Using Salt-Assisted Liquid–Liquid Extraction Combined with LC–MS/MS

2025· article· en· W4417315601 on OpenAlexaff
Erhan Canbay, Çetin Uzun, Yasemin Akçay, Ebru Canda, Havva Yazıcı, Sema Kalkan Uçar, Mahmut Çöker, Eser Yıldırım Sözmen

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtraction (chemistry)Matrix (chemical analysis)ReproducibilityHuman plasmaAmmonium acetateDetection limit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Background: Lyso-Gb1 and Lyso-Gb3 are key biomarkers for Gaucher type 1 and Fabry diseases, offering high diagnostic accuracy and utility in disease monitoring. However, conventional sample preparation workflows for their LC–MS/MS quantification often require large volumes of organic solvents, generate hazardous waste, and involve time-consuming steps, limiting routine applicability. Objective: This study aimed to develop, validate, and apply a rapid, sensitive, and environmentally friendly LC–MS/MS method using salt-assisted liquid–liquid extraction (SALLE) for the simultaneous determination of Lyso-Gb1 and Lyso-Gb3 in human plasma. Methods: The SALLE procedure was optimized for extraction-solvent type and volume, salt type, and concentration, with heptane (450 μL) and ammonium acetate (5 M) selected as optimal conditions to achieve high recovery and minimal matrix effects. Method validation was performed according to ICH M10 guidelines, evaluating selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, matrix effect, carry-over, dilution integrity, stability, and reinjection reproducibility. Clinical applicability was assessed in two independent real-sample applications: (i) 31 healthy individuals and 20 Gaucher type 1 patients for Lyso-Gb1, and (ii) 29 healthy individuals and 13 Fabry disease patients for Lyso-Gb3. Result: The method demonstrated excellent linearity for Lyso-Gb1 (0.380–200 ng/mL, R 2 = 0.9890) and Lyso-Gb3 (0.756–200 ng/mL, R 2 = 0.9982), with low LLOQs (0.380 and 0.756 ng/mL, respectively), recoveries of 92.5–109.9%, and negligible matrix effects. In clinical samples, Lyso-Gb1 and Lyso-Gb3 concentrations were significantly higher in their respective patient groups compared to healthy controls ( p < 0.0001). ROC analysis showed perfect discrimination for both biomarkers (AUC = 1.000), with optimal cut-offs of 5.80 ng/mL for Lyso-Gb1 and 3.334 ng/mL for Lyso-Gb3, each yielding 100% sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: The developed SALLE–LC–MS/MS workflow is robust, high-throughput, and fully compliant with green-chemistry principles, using minimal organic solvent, reducing hazardous waste, and shortening the preparation time. Its excellent analytical performance and perfect clinical discrimination support its integration into routine diagnostic laboratories for the efficient diagnosis and monitoring of Gaucher type 1 and Fabry diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207