MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417321217 · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-09345-0

Fecal microbiota transplantation to reduce immune activation in ART-treated people with HIV with low CD4/CD8 ratio: protocol for the single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Gutsy study (CIHR/CTN PT038)

2025· article· en· W4417321217 on OpenAlexafffund
Stéphane Isnard, Carolina Berini, Seema Nair Parvathy, Orthy Aiyana, Léna Royston, Tsoarello Mabanga, Péter L. Lakatos, Talat Bessissow, Marina B. Klein, Bertrand Lebouché, Cecilia T. Costiniuk, Bertrand Routy, Michael Silverman, Jean‐Pierre Routy

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareMcGill University Health CentreLawson Health Research InstituteWestern UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHIV Legal Network
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Fecal bacteriotherapyImmune systemFecesTransplantationProtocol (science)Microbiome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite antiretroviral therapy (ART) controlling HIV viral replication, people with HIV (PWH) remain at risk for inflammatory non-AIDS comorbidities. Factors contributing to comorbidities in PWH on ART include spontaneous release of HIV products, CMV co-infection, microbial translocation, and gut dysbiosis, each driving systemic T-cell activation. In addition to ART, novel gut microbiota-modulating therapies could reduce epithelial gut permeability, microbial translocation, and immune activation. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy volunteer is a promising therapy to counteract dysbiosis, protect from gut barrier damage, and lower systemic immune activation. METHODS: The Gutsy study is a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of FMT in PWH on ART for more than 3 years, with a viral load below 50 copies/mL, a CD4 count above 200 cells/mL, and a CD4/CD8 ratio below 1.0. All participants undergo a bowel cleanse before receiving FMT or placebo capsules. In the treatment group, 10 participants receive a bowel cleanse then two high doses of FMT delivered via 30 to 40 capsules twice, 3 weeks apart. The placebo group of 10 participants receive a bowel cleanse and capsules filled with microcrystalline cellulose for equivalence in weight and color, administered under the same time course. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and stool samples are collected at each visit: before bowel cleanse (baseline 1), before the first (baseline 2) and the 2nd (visit 4) FMT/placebo, 6 weeks (visit 5) and 12 weeks (visit 6) after the first FMT/placebo; colon biopsies are obtained at visits 3 and 6 in an optional sub-study. The primary objective is to assess the effect of FMT on plasma markers of gut epithelial permeability. Secondary objectives include microbial translocation, immune activation, and HIV latent reservoir biomarkers. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that large-dose FMT in capsules, but not placebo capsules, will increase the abundance of beneficial microbes in the gut of PWH on ART, leading to decreased gut damage markers and reduced immune activation. The results of the Gutsy pilot study will inform for the calculation of sample size of larger definitive randomized clinical trials assessing the influence of FMT on immune activation in PWH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06022406. Registered on 2024-08-01. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06022406?cond=HIV&term=Gutsy&rank=1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207