MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417329339 · doi:10.1007/s40744-025-00812-3

Influence of Biological Sex on Participant Characteristics, Guselkumab Efficacy and Radiographic Progression in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of Three Randomized Trials

2025· article· en· W4417329339 on OpenAlexaff
Dafna D. Gladman, Lihi Eder, Carlo Selmi, Philip J. Mease, Alexis Ogdie, Karissa Lozenski, Elizabeth Adamson, Mohamed Sharaf, Emmanouil Rampakakis, Laura Pina Vegas, Laura C. Coates

Bibliographic record

VenueRheumatology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityWomen's College HospitalToronto Western Hospital
FundersJohnson and JohnsonSwedish Orphan BiovitrumUniversity of PennsylvaniaBiogenGilead SciencesAmgenPfizerYale UniversityEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsPost-hoc analysisPost hocRandomized controlled trialClinical trialCohort studyPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous disease, and clinical manifestations can differ between sexes. Sex-disaggregated baseline characteristics, guselkumab efficacy, and radiographic progression were assessed in a pooled cohort of randomized controlled trial (RCT) participants with active PsA. METHODS: Post hoc analyses of DISCOVER-1 (N = 381), DISCOVER-2 (N = 739), and COSMOS (N = 285) assessed sex-related baseline characteristics differences. Week (W) 24 clinical response rates with guselkumab 100 mg at W0/W4/every 8W (Q8W) were compared between sexes using multivariate logistic regression. In DISCOVER-2, multivariate repeated-measures mixed models evaluated associations between sex and radiographic progression with guselkumab Q4W + Q8W through W100, and between early (W8) response in joint disease activity with guselkumab Q4W + Q8W and radiographic progression, stratifying by sex. RESULTS: Females were older; had higher body mass index; longer PsA duration; less severe psoriasis; more prevalent enthesitis; and reported more fatigue, pain, and functional impairment. Analyses adjusting for sex-specific differences in baseline characteristics showed no significant sex impact on guselkumab clinical response. Through W100, males exhibited significantly greater radiographic progression than females in unadjusted and adjusted models. Early clinical improvement in joint disease activity with guselkumab afforded significantly less radiographic progression through W100 in males (p = 0.0288) and numerically less in females. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being associated with significant differences in characteristics at baseline, sex had no independent effect on guselkumab clinical efficacy in this RCT cohort. The known independent association between male sex and radiographic progression was confirmed; males exhibited a stronger relationship between early improvement in joint disease activity and lower long-term rates of radiographic progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03162796, NCT03158285, NCT03796858.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRheumatology and TherapySame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207