Immunogenicity of Sulfated Lactosyl Archaeol Archaeosome-Adjuvanted Versus Non-Adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Spike Booster Vaccines in Young and Aged Balb/c Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The rise of immune escape variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has prompted the development of vaccines based on the variant’s spike antigen sequence. Since variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are mostly administered as boosters to individuals previously vaccinated with reference (Ref.) strain-based vaccines, a better understanding of their immunogenicity in this context is essential. Protein subunit vaccines have a well-established track record of safety. Herein, we assessed the ability of variant-specific protein subunit vaccine formulations to boost pre-existing Ref. strain-specific immune responses compared to boosting with a Ref. strain-specific formulation in young and aged female Balb/c mice. Methods: Following a priming vaccination series with Ref. spike protein adjuvanted with sulfated lactosyl archaeol (SLA) archaeosomes on days 0 and 21, immune responses were evaluated in young and aged female Balb/c mice. On day 91, mice received a third immunization with Ref., Beta, or Delta spike protein formulations, with or without SLA archaeosomes. Antibody titers, neutralization activity, and cellular immune responses were measured to assess the impact of the booster formulation. Results: Aged mice exhibited lower antibody titers throughout the study and a decline over time compared to young mice. After a third immunization, responses were boosted by all vaccine formulations (Ref., Beta, or Delta), with or without adjuvant. However, variant-specific antigen formulations did not overcome immune imprinting from the priming series or increase neutralization activity against the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 variants in either age group. Conclusions: Variant-specific protein subunit vaccines enhanced immune responses but did not overcome immune imprinting induced by the Ref. strain’s priming. The inclusion of SLA archaeosomes improved cellular immunity, supporting their potential role in optimizing booster vaccine performance, particularly in aged populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".