MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417477344 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-25959-0

From cigarettes to symptoms: the association between smoking and depression in the German National Cohort (NAKO)

2025· article· en· W4417477344 on OpenAlexaff
Maja P. Völker, Chiara Callies, Josef Frank, Jerome C. Foo, Iris Reinhard, Lea Zillich, Johanna Klinger-König, Hans J. Grabe, Achim G. Beule, Angelika Erhardt, Alexander Pabst, Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller, Bernhard T. Baune, Claudia Trenkwalder, Michael Wagner, Lilian Krist, Thomas Keil, Tobias Pischon, Katharina Nimptsch, Matthias B. Schulze, Börge Schmidt, Rafael Mikolajczyk, Nadia Obi, Volker Harth, Carolina Judith Klett-Tammen, Heiko Becher, Karin Halina Greiser, André Karch, Sabine Schipf, Claudia Meinke‐Franze, Patricia Bohmann, Michael F. Leitzmann, Hermann Brenner, Ute Mons, Emanuel Schwarz, Klaus Peter Berger, Jutta Mata, Stephanie H. Witt, Fabian Streit

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftHector StiftungBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungHector Stiftung IIHelmholtz-Gemeinschaft
KeywordsBiostatisticsDepression (economics)Smoking cessationMental healthGermanConsumption (sociology)Association (psychology)Epidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although the association between smoking and depression is well-established, the underlying mechanisms and contextual factors remain insufficiently understood. We examined the association between smoking and depression, including detailed dose-response and timing-related relationships, using baseline data from a large population-based cohort, the German National Cohort (NAKO). METHODS: The analysis comprised 173,890 participants (19-72 years, 50.21% female). Lifetime and current depression were assessed via self-reported physician's diagnosis, the Major Depressive Disorder module of the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and the depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Smoking behavior was assessed using self-reported smoking status, age at initiation, cigarettes per day, and time since smoking cessation. Associations between smoking and depression measures were analyzed using regression models adjusted for sex, age, age², education, Body Mass Index, and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: Lifetime depression was more prevalent among individuals who currently or formerly smoked compared to those who never smoked. Currently smoking individuals also reported most current depressive symptoms, followed by formerly smoking individuals and those who never smoked. A dose-response relationship was observed, with more cigarettes per day being associated with more current depressive symptoms. Later age at smoking initiation was associated with later depression onset. Time since smoking cessation was positively associated with time since last depressive episode and negatively with current depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support an association between smoking and depression. Robust dose-response relationships were found, with higher cigarette consumption associated with more severe depressive symptoms, and longer time since cessation linked to lower depression levels. These results highlight smoking as a meaningful and modifiable contributor to current and lifetime depression, suggesting that quitting smoking or reducing cigarette consumption may benefit mental health. Early prevention of smoking initiation, along with integrated approaches that combine smoking cessation support with mental health care, may help reduce both smoking rates and depression burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicSmoking Behavior and Cessation→French-language works237,207→