MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417523935 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5c05530

Coupling Liquid Chromatography to Orbitrap Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry: Overcoming Isotope Effects of Chromatography and Amount-Dependency by Peak Homogenization

2025· article· en· W4417523935 on OpenAlexaff
Aoife Canavan, Leonhard Prechtl, Habib Al-Ghoul, Nils Kuhlbusch, Andrea M. Erhardt, Martin Elsner

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsThermo Fisher Scientific (Canada)
FundersInternational Atomic Energy Agency
KeywordsAnalyteIsotopologueMass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OrbitrapIsotopeStable isotope ratio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Electrospray ionization Orbitrap mass spectrometry (ESI-Orbitrap-MS) has recently proven to be a powerful tool for compound- and position-specific stable isotope analysis, targeting isotopologues of multiple elements (H, C, N, O, S) in polar analytes. However, studies have so far mainly focused on pure analyte solutions via direct infusion. Here, we present the online coupling of liquid chromatography (LC) to ESI-Orbitrap-MS for stable isotope analysis of sulfamethoxazole (SMX), a synthetic antimicrobial, used as a model compound. Our study explored the fidelity of isotope values with two strategies for capturing and broadening chromatographic peaks after LC. When capturing the target analyte in a capillary (0.7 mm inner diameter), peak shape was retained, resulting in systematic deviations in isotope values caused by isotope effects from chromatography of up to 70‰ and amount-dependency of up to 65‰. A dynamic mixing chamber was used to homogenize the target analyte upon elution, removing these deviations and resulting in stable carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur isotopologue ratios in various fragments of sulfamethoxazole across the chromatographic peak. Comparison with data from conventional magnetic sector isotope ratio mass spectrometry successfully calibrated the setup for carbon and sulfur isotope ratio analysis. This resulted in a precision for δ 13 C within the isoxazole moiety from SMX of 1.5‰ (95% confidence intervals CIs derived from uncertainties of sample ( n = 4) and reference ( n = 5)), and for δ 34 S in the SO 2 fragment of 0.9‰ (95% CI, derived again from uncertainties of sample ( n = 4) and reference ( n = 5)). This work paves the way for the online coupling of LC to ESI-Orbitrap-MS in future compound- and position-specific stable isotope analyses across various research fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical Chemistry→Same topicIsotope Analysis in Ecology→French-language works237,207→