MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of Novel CXC Chemokine Receptor 7 (CXCR7) Ligands: Selectivity Switch from CXCR4 Antagonists with a Cyclic Pentapeptide Scaffold

2015· article· en· W613697576 on OpenAlexafffund
Shinya Oishi, Tomoko Kuroyanagi, Tatsuhiko Kubo, Nicolas Montpas, Yasushi Yoshikawa, Ryosuke Misu, Yuka Kobayashi, Hiroaki Ohno, Nikolaus Heveker, Toshio Furuya, Nobutaka Fujii

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsChemistryCXC chemokine receptorsCCL21Pentapeptide repeatChemokine receptorCXCR3AgonistReceptorFunctional selectivityCXCL14C-C chemokine receptor type 6CCL7PharmacologyBiochemistryChemokinePeptideBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CXC chemokine receptor 7 (CXCR7)/ACKR3 is a chemokine receptor that recognizes stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1)/CXCL12 and interferon-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant (I-TAC)/CXCL11. Here, we report the development of novel CXCR7-selective ligands with a cyclic pentapeptide scaffold through an SAR study of CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) selective antagonist FC131 [cyclo(-d-Tyr-l-Arg-l-Arg-l-Nal-Gly-), Nal = 3-(2-naphthyl)alanine]. Substitution of Gly with l-Pro switched the receptor preference of the peptides from CXCR4 to CXCR7. The SAR study led to the identification of a potent CXCR7 ligand, FC313 [cyclo(-d-Tyr-l-Arg-l-MeArg-l-Nal-l-Pro-)], which recruits β-arrestin to CXCR7. Investigations via receptor mutagenesis and molecular modeling experiments suggest a possible binding mode of the cyclic pentapeptide CXCR7 agonist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207