MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893262822 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15130564

ASSESSING THE RESEARCH CAPABILITY OF TEACHERS IN THE ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM: FACTORS INFLUENCING EFFECTIVE RESEARCH SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN DEPED REGION XI

2025· article· en· W6893262822 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoveltyResearch designPsychological interventionConceptual frameworkEducational researchResearch dataScale (ratio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This study assessed the research capability of Alternative Learning System (ALS) teachers in DepEd Region XI, examining the factors that influence their research skills. Specifically, it focused on teachers’ research knowledge, attitudes toward research, and the barriers they face in conducting research, alongside their research capability in conceptual, computational, and technical skills. Using a quantitative non-experimental research design with a descriptive-correlational technique and regression analysis, data were gathered through a structured survey instrument. Findings indicated a moderate research capability, with strengths in computational skills but challenges in conceptual and technical aspects. While teachers had high research knowledge and positive attitudes, barriers such as limited resources, time constraints, and insufficient training hindered research engagement. Statistical analysis indicated a significant positive correlation between research knowledge, attitudes toward research, barriers to conducting research, and overall research capability. Moreover, research knowledge emerged as the strongest predictor of teachers’ research capability. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to strengthen ALS teachers’ research culture and skills, ultimately improving evidence-based educational practices. Keywords: alternative learning system, attitudes toward research, barriers, DepEd Region XI, research capability, research knowledge. Title: ASSESSING THE RESEARCH CAPABILITY OF TEACHERS IN THE ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM: FACTORS INFLUENCING EFFECTIVE RESEARCH SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN DEPED REGION XI Author: Erwin C. Belain, Jihan A. Labrador International Journal of Novel Research in Interdisciplinary Studies ISSN 2394-9716 Vol. 12, Issue 2, March 2025 - April 2025 Page No: 1-21 Novelty Journals Website: www.noveltyjournals.com Published Date: 03-April-2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15130564 Paper Download Link (Source) https://www.noveltyjournals.com/upload/paper/ASSESSING%20THE%20RESEARCH%20CAPABILITY-03042025-6.pdf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207