Quasi-experimental methods for wildfire impact quantification : applications of distance-adjusted propensity score matching to forest inventory data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantifying wildfire impacts on forest ecosystems is challenging due to the lack of pre-fire data or controls from experiments over a large landscape. Quasi-experimental methods have been popular in various fields of science where experiments are difficult to implement. However, the application of quasi-experimental methods to ecological data have not yet been fully explored. In this dissertation, I applied quasi-experimental methods to quantify wildfire impacts on aboveground forest woody carbon mass using national forest inventory data from the United States of America (USA) and British Columbia (BC), Canada. First, I compared distance-adjusted propensity score matching (DAPSM) with propensity score matching (PSM) and spatial matching (SM) to quantify the changes in forest woody carbon mass due to wildfires in Washington and Oregon, USA. Incorporating spatial information in addition to environmental covariates was essential to account for both observed and unobserved environmental covariates in matching. Thus, DAPSM was favored over PSM and SM. Second, I conducted a sensitivity analysis on the performance of DAPSM with different data availability to provide a practical guide of sample size and environmental covariates required to quantify wildfire impacts. I found that the inclusion of the spatial distance compensated for the omission of key covariates, but this compensation was not effective for small sample sizes. Third, I applied DAPSM with and without replacement to three datasets with small sample sizes collected for case-studies of wildfire impacts in south-central BC. DAPSM with replacement using BC forest inventory plot data enabled balancing the environmental covariates between burned and control plots under certain circumstances. The controls produced by DAPSM captured the trends in the amount of woody carbon masses under different fire severities, implying that they may replace the pre-burn data once the propensity scores are adequately addressed. Overall, the implementation of DAPSM allowed the assessment of wildfire impacts on forest carbon by building a causal relationship from observational forest inventory data. Based on applied examples, this dissertation provides guidelines for employing propensity score matching to quantify the impacts of natural disturbances. This research contributes to future studies considering quasi-experimental approaches for analyzing ecological data where controlled experiments are impossible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.252 | 0.450 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".