MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983167600

L’évaluation de la performance de stagiaires basée sur des observations rapportées dans les programmes professionnalisants en sciences de la santé : données disponibles et perspectives de métaévaluatrices et métaévaluateurs en sciences infirmières

2023· dissertation· fr· W6983167600 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic integrity and plagiarism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaH2020 European Research CouncilUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
KeywordsOccupational trainingHuman scienceContinuing educationChristian ministry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.334
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.565
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3340.565
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.018
Bibliometrics0.0120.014
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0050.007
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
DomainEvaluation
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)Same topicAcademic integrity and plagiarismFrench-language works237,207