MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986202128

Part I: Mechanistic Insight in Alkyl-Alkyl and Aryl-Aryl Negishi Cross-Coupling
\nPart II: Large Scale Synthesis of NHC Precursors: 2,6-DI(3-Pentyl) Aniline and 2,6-DI 
\n(4-Heptyl) Aniline

2016· other· en· W6986202128 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueYorkSpace (York University) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegishi couplingZincateHalideReagentMoietyAnilineAlkylAryl
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Part I: An efficient method for alkyl-alkyl Negishi cross-coupling reaction of unactivated primary alkyl halides with higher-order zincate species (synthesized from dialkylzinc and a non-coordinating halide salt in situ) using Pd-PEPPSI-IPent (Pyridine-Enhanced Pre-catalyst Preparation Stabilization and Initiation) pre-catalyst has been developed. The method requires no additive (such as LiX) or use of a polar co-solvent (such as THF/DMI) and reactions proceed in THF solvent alone. The transmetalating species in alkyl-alkyl Negishi cross-coupling has been identified and the catalytic cycle has been amended to include the formation of the higher-order zincate species. 
\n\tSubsequent investigation into diarylzinc as reagents in Negishi cross-coupling have shown they transmetalate directly without the use of halide additive in THF alone producing arylzinc halide as a resting state. Once the dielectric of the solvent becomes sufficiently polar, coupling resumes, and the aryl moiety transmetalates to palladium. The optimized protocol using Pd-PEPPSI-IPent allowed for the coupling of a variety of alkyl- and aryl- organozinc reagents providing the corresponding products in good to quantitative yields. Moreover, the developed protocol is generally applicable and tolerant of a variety of functional groups including esters, and nitriles. 
\n\tPart II: An improved and efficient method for the preparation of sterically demanding Pd PEPPSI-IPent, IPentCl, IHept, and IHeptCl pre-catalysts are presented and the results of optimization for the multi-gram synthesis of 2,6-disubstituted anilines is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYorkSpace (York University)French-language works237,207