Bioassays of Analogs of Pleurocidin-Amide Indicate that Change at <em>N</em>-Terminus is Key to Improved Efficacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
American Peptide Society used the same production team (scientific and technical editor) as in 2009.And again, manuscripts were accepted through the internet page, entered into the database which allowed creating indexes on the fly and simplified communication with authors.Processed manuscripts were available for proofing -helping us to correct blunders made by us and authors in the rush to deliver the book as soon as possible.The finalized book was available on the website for downloading 8 weeks after the symposium ended.The "real book" is available from "just in time" printing process at www.lulu.com.Due to the fact that the American Peptide Society is a nonprofit organization, there is no margin charged for the book, and all members can order it for production cost.Our thanks go to all authors who delivered manuscripts of a high technical quality before the deadline.This time we had minimal number of authors trying to "squeeze in" three pages of text on two pages of manuscript, or modifying the template of the text file.Time to time we were amused by scientists leaving the parts of the original template text in their manuscripts, but in general, we received papers of reasonable quality.Due to the time constraints, we were not able to redo the graphical components of the manuscripts -graphs and illustrations -authors have to understand that some of the graphs looking good at the poster size are far from ideal for book page size.We believe that the quality of the figures and schemes is a part of the presentation skills of the authors and we let them show it.In the past we were insisting on the delivery of only monochromatic graphics with large enough details (fonts).However, since only less than 5% of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".