Tradurre il teatro contemporaneo del Québec: uno studio attraverso la traduzione di "Wollstonecraft" di Sarah Berthiaume
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il presente lavoro di tesi si inserisce nell’ambito della traduzione di testi teatrali, in particolare viene qui proposta la traduzione dal francese del testo “Wollstonecraft” di Sarah Berthiaume, esponente del teatro contemporaneo del Québec. Il primo capitolo verte sulla natura del testo teatrale, che è analizzato dal punto di vista semiotico e testuale, per poi concentrarsi sulle istanze teoriche e le strategie messe in atto nel corso del tempo per la traduzione del teatro. Il secondo capitolo esamina il contesto in cui la pièce è stata creata, quindi il teatro del Québec, di cui si presenta una panoramica storica, un accenno alle questioni linguistiche e un’analisi di enti e organizzazioni per la diffusione del teatro quebecchese francofono in Canada e nel mondo. Il terzo capitolo è dedicato alla presentazione dell’autrice, alla genesi dell’opera e all’analisi dei personaggi e dei temi affrontati nella pièce. Successivamente, si propone la traduzione del testo teatrale in questione, corredata da un’analisi delle metodologie e degli strumenti della traduzione, nonché da un commento linguistico e traduttologico che motiva le scelte traduttive e che ha lo scopo di osservare le principali difficoltà di traduzione del francese del Québec basandosi su un caso concreto. Il lavoro si pone come contributo al dibattito sulla traduzione teatrale, mettendo in luce nello specifico le caratteristiche linguistiche e culturali del francese del Québec. This work is situated in the field of theatrical translation. It proposes a translation from French of the play Wollstonecraft by Sarah Berthiaume, a prominent voice in contemporary Québécois theatre. The first chapter focuses on the nature of theatrical text, which is analyzed from a semiotic and textual perspective, and then moves on to explore the theoretical approaches and strategies that have been developed over time for theatrical translation. The second chapter examines the context where the play was created: Québécois theatre. After an historical overview, it presents an analysis of linguistic issues and provides a presentation of institutions involved in promoting Francophone Québécois theatre in Canada and around the world. The third chapter is dedicated to the presentation of the author, the genesis of the play and an analysis of its characters and themes. Later, the translation of the play is presented, accompanied by an analysis of the methodologies and tools used during the translation process, along with a linguistics and translation commentary. The commentary justifies the translation choices and aims to highlight the main challenges involved in translating Québécois French. This work wants to contribute to the theatrical translation debate and to highlight the linguistics and cultural characteristics of Québécois French.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".