La letteratura come strumento di costruzione e legittimazione identitaria. Proposta di traduzione e commento traduttologico del romanzo Moncton mantra di Gérald Leblanc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Questo lavoro propone la traduzione e il relativo commento traduttologico del romanzo di Gérald Leblanc, Moncton mantra. La particolarità del romanzo risiede nel fatto di appartenere alla letteratura acadiana, una letteratura minoritaria all'interno dell'universo francofono. Il primo capitolo del lavoro presenta la storia dell'Acadia, regione marittima del Canada, il suo contesto linguistico e demo-linguistico, passando in seguito alla descrizione delle rappresentazioni linguistiche e dell'insicurezza linguistica che si ritrovano nei locutori francofoni, e concludendo il capitolo con la presentazione del corpus. Il secondo capitolo è invece costituito dalla traduzione in italiano, presentata con il testo francese a fronte. Il terzo capitolo riguarda l'analisi linguistico-traduttologica del lavoro di traduzione, concentrandosi sui fenomeni di maggior rilievo incontrati e sulle strategie che sono state adottate per tradurli. This work offers a translation proposal and the translational comment of Gérald Leblanc's roman, Moncton mantra. The distinctive trait of this roman is the fact that it belongs to the Acadian literature, which is considered as a marginal literature compared to other francophone literatures. The first chapter is devoted to Acadian history and Acadie’s linguistic and demo-linguistic contexts, followed by a description of the speaker's perception of their own language and of their feeling of linguistic uncertainty; the chapter will finally introduce the corpus. The second chapter consists of the Italian translation of the roman, with the French original text. The third chapter concerns the linguistic and translational analysis, with particular attention to the most relevant phenomena and to the translational strategies that have been adopted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".