MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052340328

The search for inhibitors of O-acetylpeptidoglycan esterase 1a (Ape1a) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

2009· dissertation· en· W7052340328 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEsteraseEnzymeNeisseria gonorrhoeaeDrug discoveryViability assayAntibioticsCellHigh-throughput screeningNucleic acid
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis reports an investigation and discovery of an inhibitor of O-acetylpeptidoglycan esterase 1a (Ape1a). With the rise in rates of antibiotic resistant microbes it is becoming increasingly important to discover new targets related to the cell wall, cell membrane, or synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins. Ape1a, an esterase responsible for cleaving the acetyl group from MurNAc and allowing the activity of muramidases, presented as a potential target. Optimal storage conditions of the enzyme were determined and an assay that was amenable to high throughput screening (HTS) was developed. Ape1a was then screened against a selection from the Canadian Compound Collection in an effort to discover an inhibitor. Several compounds were determined to be false positives; however one compound, purpurin, showed true inhibition. MICs performed 'in vivo' on various Gram positive and Gram negative organisms corroborated the microtitre plate findings. These findings were further supported by results from testing performed on PO, Ape1a's natural substrate. Purpurin was found to be an effective inhibitor of 'B. cereus', an O-acetylated organism, at a relatively low concentration of 16 [mu]g/ml. These results supported the hypothesis that Ape1a is necessary for cell viability in organisms possessing Ape1a Thus, this compound serves as a potential target for drug development and may aid in the fight against drug resistant microbes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207