Perspectivas de género en la traducción de los poemas de LucÃa Sánchez Saornil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
– The main aim of this research is to provide an analysis of the Italian translation of the poetry of Lucia Sánchez Saornil, the only female author of the Spanish Ultraist movement, combining the theory of poetic translation with gender studies in translation. The translated poems that I analyze in this article are my own translation of Sánchez Saornil’s work. These translations are still in progress for a future publication. The stated goal is to find a middle way between the radical strategies outlined by the Canadian feminist movement during the Eighties (cf. Diaz- Diocaretz 1985, Hannay 1985 , Chamberlain 1988, 1998 , 1990 Godard, Lotbiniere - Harwod 1991, Von Flotow 1991 1994, 1997, 1998, Simons 1996), and the translation techniques that are required to recreate the features of a poem without betraying the style and aesthetics of the author (cf. Holmes 1969, 1978, Lefevere techniques 1975, Popovic 1976 Beaugrande 1978, Etkind 1982, Raffel 1988). Moreover, I will analyse the perspectives opened by the great feminist challenge in translation, and the role of literature and translation in the rise of a new sensitivity in the female question. Keywords : translation, poetry, feminist translation theories, gender studies, Avant-garde. Resumen – Esta investigación pretende ofrecer un análisis de la traducción al italiano de la obra poética de Lucía Sánchez Saornil, única representante femenina del Ultraísmo, combinando las técnicas propias de la traducción poética con los estudios de género en traductología. Las traducciones que se analizan en este estudio las he realizado yo misma y están todavía en fase de elaboración para una futura publicación. El objetivo planteado es encontrar un camino intermedio entre las estrategias radicales trazadas por la corriente feminista canadiense en los años Ochenta (cfr. Diaz- Diocaretz 1985, Hannay 1985, Chamberlain 1988, 1998, Godard 1990, Lotbiniére- Harwod 1991, Von Flotow 1991, 1994, 1997, 1998, Simons 1996), y las técnicas necesarias para realizar una traducción poética que sea capaz de recrear el conjunto de caracteristicas del original, sin traicionar el estilo y la estética de la autora (cfr. Holmes 1969, 1978, Lefevere 1975, Popovic 1976, Beaugrande 1978, Etkind 1982, Raffel 1988). Además, el trabajo permitirá reflexionar sobre las perspectivas abiertas por la gran apuesta feminista en traductología, y sobre el papel de la traducción y de la literatura para la creación de una sensibilidad de género moderna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".