MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062658137

Trousse d'accompagnement en CRRC : synthèse des enjeux de conduite responsable en recherche-création et propositions d'outils réflexifs

2018· other· fr· W7062658137 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · 2018
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectron Spin Resonance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Subject (documents)PropositionIdentification (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette trousse a été réalisée dans le cadre du projet de recherche « La conduite responsable en recherche-création : Outiller de façon créative pour répondre aux enjeux d’une pratique en effervescence ». Il a été financé par les Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQ) dans le cadre de l’action concertée « La conduite responsable en recherche : mieux comprendre pour mieux agir » (2016-2018).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.051
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0510.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0130.031
Scholarly communication0.0300.015
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)Same topicElectron Spin Resonance StudiesFrench-language works237,207