Employee Engagement through Transformational Leadership: Strategy for Creating a Thriving Team in the Banking Sector of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examined the influence of transformational leadership on employee engagement as a strategic driver for organizational success. It is evident that human resources management is a primary challenge in banking and is critical to organizational effectiveness. This study investigated the research question through a secondary literature review, using the four components of transformational leadership to better understand how bank employees perceive transformational leadership behaviours related to employee engagement. Since employee engagement is regarded as a suitable metric for assessing the well-being of employees, particularly those in the service industry, management is expected to understand how to create an engaged workforce and the best way to achieve employee involvement and commitment. It is argued that a leader’s ability can influence several aspects of the employee experience, including customer care, engagement, and productivity. However, developing leadership skills is one way to enable workers to experience care and contribute to the overall vision within the banking industry where this research was conducted. Therefore, this study investigated how TL creates a thriving team by focusing on TL features and employee experience concerning work engagement in the banking sector to enhance competitive advantage and improve team leadership, people management, and collaboration competencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".