MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116694628 · doi:10.1139/cjm-2025-0198

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI H5N1, clade 2.3.4.4b, genotype C2.1) in commercial ring-necked pheasants during the 2022 outbreak in the United States

2025· article· en· W7116694628 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kayla R. Niel, Kaitlyn M. St. Charles, Jonathan Y Elissa, Megan E. Lighty, Amos Ssematimba, Marie Culhane, Alvin Crespo-Bellido, Nídia S. Trovão, Martha I. Nelson, C. Cardona

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfluenza A virus subtype H5N1CladeOutbreakHighly pathogenicGenotypePhylogenetic treeVirusInfluenza A virus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b was introduced into North America in 2021. In 2022, clade 2.3.4.4b spilled into domestic poultry in the United States (U.S.), resulting in the largest HPAI outbreak in U.S. history. In December 2023, H5N1 2.3.4.4b was detected on an upland game bird farm in Pennsylvania. History, clinical signs, and gross lesions were suggestive of marble spleen disease. However, HPAI was identified by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction; gene sequencing confirmed genotype C2.1 with phylodynamic analyses providing evidence of a wild bird introduction. Predictive mathematical modeling estimated the time of virus introduction onto the farm (15 days (95% C.I., 11-23) before the date of confirmed detection) being similar or longer than previously described for domestic poultry. Although bioexclusion measures were unable to prevent the initial exposure due to industry rearing practices, biocontainment procedures appeared to prevent spread. The lessons learned from this case may be important for other animal agriculture commodities, especially those species that are infrequently handled or observed and may have inaccurately calculated mortality levels. This well-characterized outbreak and other experiences with natural infection should be taken as opportunities to better understand the field dynamics of this virus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→