MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117325755 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02511-25

Evaluation of the Bruker MALDI Biotyper (MBT) subtyping module for detection of <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> carbapenemase (KPC) in <i>Enterobacterales</i> in a Canadian clinical microbiology laboratory

2025· article· en· W7117325755 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emma Finlayson‐Trick, Heather Glassman, Jasmine Ahmed-Bentley, Xinhe Liu, Linda Tsui, Lori Sung, Charlene Porter, Claudine Desruisseaux, Valéry Lavergne, Suefay Liu, Jennifer Tat, Anthony Lieu, Aruna Uma Chandran, Marthe Charles

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsVancouver Infectious Diseases CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubtypingClinical microbiologyCarbapenemInfection controlPlasmidPathogenic organismClinical Practice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Early detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales enables prompt initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and infection prevention and control measures. The matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-ToF) Biotyper (MBT) Subtyping Module (Bruker Daltonics) uses a characteristic spectral peak at ~11,109 m/z to identify KPC-producing Enterobacterales . The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the MBT Module to detect KPC among a variety of clinical and reference (AR Bank) Enterobacterales isolates. Detection of KPC was compared between the MBT Module and a laboratory-developed real-time KPC PCR. Of the 93 isolates tested, 58 (62.4%) were positive for KPC by PCR (39 clinical and 19 AR bank isolates), and 35 were negative. Among the KPC-positive PCR isolates, nine (seven clinical and two AR bank) also tested positive for KPC by the MBT Module. KPC detection via the MBT Module had a sensitivity of 15.5% and a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%. This study also assessed the performance of the MBT Module to detect KPC-2 versus KPC-3 among the AR Bank isolates. The MBT Module detected 2/5 (40.0%) KPC-2 and 0/14 of KPC-3 AR Bank isolates. As sensitivity was low, but specificity was high, a positive MBT Module result reliably predicts the presence of KPC; however, negative results cannot be relied upon to be truly KPC-negative. IMPORTANCE Enterobacterales , a large order of pathogenic and commensal bacteria, can gain resistance to carbapenems through the acquisition of plasmids carrying genes, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). Early detection of KPC is crucial for patient care; however, current detection methods that involve multiple time-consuming steps, commonly only undertaken after overnight susceptibility testing, indicate possible carbapenem resistance. This study examined the ability of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-ToF), a common diagnostic tool in the clinical laboratory, to detect KPC among Enterobacterales . KPC detection via MALDI-ToF had low sensitivity but 100% specificity. These results support and expand the microbiological and geographical range of prior publications for this tool. A practical application of this highly specific method would involve rapid triaging of KPC-positive isolates a day earlier than current methods, permitting initiation of more timely therapeutic and infection prevention and control measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207