Long-term tofersen in SOD1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance Approximately 2% of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases are attributable to a pathogenic variant in the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene. Tofersen, an intrathecal antisense oligonucleotide designed to reduce SOD1 protein synthesis, is the first and only approved therapy for the treatment of ALS in adults who have a variant in the SOD1 gene. Objective To evaluate the long-term effects of tofersen in adults with SOD1-ALS. Design, Setting, and Participants The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled VALOR trial (A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tofersen in SOD1-ALS; conducted from March 2019 to July 2021) evaluated tofersen use over 28 weeks in adults (18 years and older) with weaknesses attributable to ALS and a confirmed SOD1 pathogenic variant at 32 sites in 10 countries; participants could then enroll in an open-label extension (OLE; completed August 2024). Intervention and Exposure Adults with SOD1-ALS were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive tofersen (100 mg) or placebo over a 24-week period in the VALOR study. All participants in the OLE were treated with tofersen. Main Outcomes and Measures Integrated analysis of VALOR and the OLE study aimed to compare early start vs placebo/delayed start (approximately 6 months later) treatment with tofersen. Key efficacy end points included measures of axonal injury and neurodegeneration (neurofilament), function and strength, quality of life, and survival. Results VALOR enrolled 108 participants with 42 unique SOD1 pathogenic variants (mean [SD] age: placebo/delayed-start group 51.2 [11.6] [n = 36]; early-start group: 48.1 [12.6] [n = 72]) with 19 (53%) and 43 (60%) of participants being male in the placebo/delayed- and early-start groups, respectively. Overall, 95/108 participants (88%) enrolled in the OLE, and 46 participants completed the OLE (early-start group, 34 [47%]; placebo/delayed-start group, 12 [33%]). At OLE completion, participants could have accumulated 3.5 years or more (range, 192-276 weeks) of follow-up from the start of VALOR. Over 148 weeks, earlier initiation of tofersen (compared to later initiation) was associated with numerically less decline in measures of clinical function (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–Revised score, −9.9 vs −13.5 points), respiratory function (slow vital capacity, −13.8% vs −18.1%), muscle strength (handheld dynamometry megascore, −0.38 vs −0.43 points), and quality of life (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5 score, 17.0 vs 22.5 points; EuroQol 5 Dimension, 5 Level Questionnaire score, −0.1 vs −0.2 points). Tofersen prolonged survival relative to the expected natural history of SOD1-ALS. Most adverse events were consistent with ALS progression or known procedural adverse effects. All serious neurological adverse events were reversible; few led to tofersen discontinuation. Conclusions and Relevance Final data from VALOR and the OLE demonstrated the benefit of tofersen in SOD1-ALS and provide clear rationale for its use in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".