Stochastic modeling of daily precipitation process in the context of climate change
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Information on the variations of rainfall in space and time is essential for the design and management of different water resources systems. This thesis proposed a new stochastic model (referred herein as the MCME model) that is able to capture accurately the statistical properties of the observed daily precipitation process for the current and future climates under different climate change scenarios. The MCME model consists of two components: (i) the first component representing the daily precipitation occurrence process based on the first-order two-state Markov Chain (MC); and (ii) the second component describing the distribution of daily precipitation amounts using the Mixed Exponential (ME) distribution. A comparative study was carried out to assess the performance of the proposed model as compared to the popular LARS-WG model using observed daily precipitation data from a network of nine raingauges representing different climatic conditions across Quebec. Results of this study have indicated the better performance of the MCME model in terms of its accuracy and robustness in the modeling of the daily precipitation process. In addition, an improved perturbation method was developed for establishing the linkages between the proposed MCME model with the coarse-scale climate model outputs. Results of a comparative study using both MCME and LARS-WG models have demonstrated the best performance of the proposed perturbation method as compared with other existing perturbation methods in terms of its accuracy in capturing different statistical properties of the projected daily precipitation process for future periods. Finally, an assessment of the performance of the MCME and LARS-WG models based on the proposed perturbation technique was performed in the context of climate change using daily precipitation data from a network of five stations located in Quebec and Ontario and the downscaled simulation data from 21 different global climate models. Results of this assessment have indicated the feasibility and accuracy of the proposed MCME model and the proposed perturbation technique for downscaling daily precipitation processes for impact and adaptation studies in practice
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".